Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Study of the Low-Lying T=32 States in Na21

R. C. Bearse

J. C. Legg

G. C. Morrison

R. E. Segel*

  • Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439

  • Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas

  • Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439

  • Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439 and Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201

  • *Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation.

Phys. Rev. C 1, 608 – Published 1 February, 1970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.1.608

Abstract

The γ decays of the two lowest T=32 states in Na21 at 8.97 and 9.22 MeV were studied as resonances in the Ne20(p, γ) reaction by use of a gas cell and a 30-cc Ge(Li) detector. For the lower resonance, we find three branches: to the 32+ ground state (11%), to the 52+ first excited state (50%), and to the 72+ second excited state (39%). These results imply that J=52+ for the T=32 state. On the simple rotational model, transitions from states of the K=12 (Nilsson orbit #6) band are possible only to the ground-state K=32 (#7) band. A J=52+, K=12 assignment for the lowest T=32 state fits the observed branching ratios. The second resonance decays predominantly to the ground state, and there is at most a 9% branch to the ½+ state at 2.41 MeV. The second resonance is assigned J=12+, K=12. If the 2.41-MeV state is K=12 (#9), no transition to it is expected. On both resonances, transitions to higher excited states are obscured by background.

References (14)

  1. D. H. Youngblood, G. C. Morrison, and R. E. Segel, Phys. Letters 22, 625 (1966)
  2. G. C. Morrison, D. H. Youngblood, R. C. Bearse, and R. E. Segel, Phys. Rev. 174, 1366 (1968)
  3. S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-Fys. Medd. 29, 16 (1955)
  4. C. Rolfs, W. Trost, I. Kuhlmann, R. Krämer, and F. Riess, Nucl. Phys. A129, 231 (1969)
  5. G. W. Butler, J. Cerny, S. W. Cosper, and R. L. McGrath, Phys. Rev. 166, 1096 (1968)
  6. A. B. McDonald and E. G. Adelberger, Phys. Letters 26B, 380 (1968)
  7. A. B. McDonald, J. R. Patterson, and H. Winkler, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13, 652 (1968) (to be published)
  8. J. C. Hardy and R. E. Bell, Can. J. Phys. 43, 1671 (1965)
  9. A. C. L. Barnard, J. B. Swint, and T. B. Clegg, Nucl. Phys. 86, 139 (1966) H. S. Adams, J. D. Fox, N. P. Heydenberg, and G. M. Temmer, Phys. Rev. 124, 1899 (1961)
  10. W. A. Fowler, C. C. Lauritsen, and T. Lauritsen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 236 (1948)
  11. E. J. Bernet, R. G. Herb, and D. B. Parkinson, Phys. Rev. 54, 398 (1938)
  12. A. J. Howard, D. A. Bromley, and E. K. Warburton, Phys. Rev. 137, B32 (1965)
  13. F. Ajzenberg-Selove, L. Cranberg, and F. S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. 124, 1548 (1961)
  14. R. D. Bent, J. E. Evans, G. C. Morrison, N. H. Gale, and I. J. van Heerden, Nucl. Phys. A90, 122 (1967)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation