- Access by Xinjiang University
Pair Spectrometer Measurements of the Radiations from Excited States of Light Nuceli
Phys. Rev. 98, 1237 – Published 1 June, 1955
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.98.1237
Abstract
A magnetic-lens pair spectrometer has been used to study the radiations produced by the bombardment of certain light nuclei with protons and deuterons from a Van de Graaff accelerator. Gamma rays from the bombardment of with 3.7-Mev protons were observed at 6.10±0.04 and 6.99±0.04 Mev. At 4.7-Mev bombarding energy, no lines were observed between 7.5 and 11.0 Mev with an intensity as great as 10 percent of that of the 6.99-Mev line. Gamma rays from the bombardment of with 2.0-Mev deuterons were observed at 3.42±0.03, 3.71±0.05, 3.94±0.06, 4.48±0.04, 4.96±0.03, 5.12±0.04, 5.74±0.03, 6.14 ±0.03, 6.53±0.05, and 6.72±0.03 Mev. At 4.0-Mev bombarding energy, lines were observed at 6.14±0.03, 6.53±0.04, 6.72±0.03, 7.09±0.03, and 7.34±0.04 Mev. Gamma rays from the bombardment of with 4.0-Mev deuterons were observed at 3.76±0.02 and 3.86±0.02 Mev. No lines were observed between 3.86 and 5.8 Mev with an intensity as great as 10 percent of that of the 3.86-Mev line. All the energies of rays given above are uncorrected for Doppler shifts which in some cases are as large as 40 kev. A search was made for nuclear pairs which might originate from the proton bombardment of . No pairs were observed at 4.0-Mev bombarding energy in the energy range between 6.5 and 9.5 Mev. A search was also made for nuclear pairs which might result from the reaction. No pairs were observed in the energy range between 5.0 and 8.5 Mev.
References (32)
- S. J. Bame and L. M. Baggett, Phys. Rev. 79, 415(A) (1950) 84, 891 (1951)
- K. Siegbahn and S. Johansson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 21, 442 (1950)
- D. E. Alburger, Rev. Sci. Instr. 23, 671 (1952)
- J. W. M. DuMond, Rev. Sci. Instr. 20, 160 (1949)
- Bent, Bonner, and Sippel, Phys. Rev. 91, 472(A) (1953)
- H. Slätis and K. Siegbahn, Arkiv Fysik 1, 339 (1949)
- H. Daniel and W. Bothe, Z. Naturforsch. 9a, 402 (1954)
- J. Fischer and J. Marshall, Rev. Sci. Instr. 23, 417 (1952)
- L. M. Baggett and S. J. Bame, Phys. Rev. 84, 154 (1951)
- R. G. Thomas and T. Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 88, 969 (1952)
- J. Terrell and G. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 83, 703 (1951)
- R. L. Walker and B. D. McDaniel, Phys. Rev. 74, 315 (1948)
- Rasmussen, Hornyak, Lauritsen, and Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 77, 617 (1950)
- F. Ajzenberg and T. Lauritsen, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 321 (1952)
- Mackin, Mims, and Mills, Phys. Rev. 93, 950(A) (1954)
- Sperduto, Buechner, Bockelman, and Browne, Phys. Rev. 96, 1316 (1954)
- Bockelman, Browne, Buechner, and Sperduto, Phys. Rev. 92, 665 (1953)
- R. E. Benenson, Phys. Rev. 90, 420 (1953)
- Cook, Bonner, and Marion, Phys. Rev. 95, 639(A) (1954) private communication
- Woodbury, Day, and Tollestrup, Phys. Rev. 92, 1199 (1953)
- Hicks, Husain, Sanders, and Beghian, Phys. Rev. 90, 163 (1953)
- Hird, Whitehead, Butler, and Collie, Phys. Rev. 96, 702 (1954)
- R. J. Mackin and W. R. Mills (private communication)
- J. Rotblat, Phys. Rev. 83, 1271 (1951)
- R. J. Mackin, Jr., Phys. Rev. 92, 529(A) (1953)
- Shire, Wormald, Lindsay-Jones, Lunden, and Stanley, Phil. Mag. 44, 1197 (1953)
- A. G. Stanley, Phil. Mag. 45, 430 (1954)
- Phillips, Cowie, and Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 83, 1049 (1951)
- G. Harries and W. T. Davies, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A65, 564 (1952)
- Beghian, Halban, Husain, and Sanders, Phys. Rev. 90, 1129 (1953)
- Dunbar, Pixley, Wenzel, and Whaling, Phys. Rev. 92, 649 (1953)
- G. Harries, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A67, 153 (1954)