All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Pair Spectrometer Measurements of the Radiations from Excited States of Light Nuceli

R. D. Bent, T. W. Bonner, and R. F. Sippel

  • The Rice Institute, Houston, Texas

Phys. Rev. 98, 1237 – Published 1 June, 1955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.98.1237

Abstract

A magnetic-lens pair spectrometer has been used to study the radiations produced by the bombardment of certain light nuclei with protons and deuterons from a Van de Graaff accelerator. Gamma rays from the bombardment of F19 with 3.7-Mev protons were observed at 6.10±0.04 and 6.99±0.04 Mev. At 4.7-Mev bombarding energy, no lines were observed between 7.5 and 11.0 Mev with an intensity as great as 10 percent of that of the 6.99-Mev line. Gamma rays from the bombardment of C13 with 2.0-Mev deuterons were observed at 3.42±0.03, 3.71±0.05, 3.94±0.06, 4.48±0.04, 4.96±0.03, 5.12±0.04, 5.74±0.03, 6.14 ±0.03, 6.53±0.05, and 6.72±0.03 Mev. At 4.0-Mev bombarding energy, lines were observed at 6.14±0.03, 6.53±0.04, 6.72±0.03, 7.09±0.03, and 7.34±0.04 Mev. Gamma rays from the bombardment of C12 with 4.0-Mev deuterons were observed at 3.76±0.02 and 3.86±0.02 Mev. No lines were observed between 3.86 and 5.8 Mev with an intensity as great as 10 percent of that of the 3.86-Mev line. All the energies of γ rays given above are uncorrected for Doppler shifts which in some cases are as large as 40 kev. A search was made for nuclear pairs which might originate from the proton bombardment of B11. No pairs were observed at 4.0-Mev bombarding energy in the energy range between 6.5 and 9.5 Mev. A search was also made for nuclear pairs which might result from the Li7(d, n)Be8 reaction. No pairs were observed in the energy range between 5.0 and 8.5 Mev.

References (32)

  1. S. J. Bame and L. M. Baggett, Phys. Rev. 79, 415(A) (1950) 84, 891 (1951)
  2. K. Siegbahn and S. Johansson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 21, 442 (1950)
  3. D. E. Alburger, Rev. Sci. Instr. 23, 671 (1952)
  4. J. W. M. DuMond, Rev. Sci. Instr. 20, 160 (1949)
  5. Bent, Bonner, and Sippel, Phys. Rev. 91, 472(A) (1953)
  6. H. Slätis and K. Siegbahn, Arkiv Fysik 1, 339 (1949)
  7. H. Daniel and W. Bothe, Z. Naturforsch. 9a, 402 (1954)
  8. J. Fischer and J. Marshall, Rev. Sci. Instr. 23, 417 (1952)
  9. L. M. Baggett and S. J. Bame, Phys. Rev. 84, 154 (1951)
  10. R. G. Thomas and T. Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 88, 969 (1952)
  11. J. Terrell and G. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 83, 703 (1951)
  12. R. L. Walker and B. D. McDaniel, Phys. Rev. 74, 315 (1948)
  13. Rasmussen, Hornyak, Lauritsen, and Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 77, 617 (1950)
  14. F. Ajzenberg and T. Lauritsen, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 321 (1952)
  15. Mackin, Mims, and Mills, Phys. Rev. 93, 950(A) (1954)
  16. Sperduto, Buechner, Bockelman, and Browne, Phys. Rev. 96, 1316 (1954)
  17. Bockelman, Browne, Buechner, and Sperduto, Phys. Rev. 92, 665 (1953)
  18. R. E. Benenson, Phys. Rev. 90, 420 (1953)
  19. Cook, Bonner, and Marion, Phys. Rev. 95, 639(A) (1954) private communication
  20. Woodbury, Day, and Tollestrup, Phys. Rev. 92, 1199 (1953)
  21. Hicks, Husain, Sanders, and Beghian, Phys. Rev. 90, 163 (1953)
  22. Hird, Whitehead, Butler, and Collie, Phys. Rev. 96, 702 (1954)
  23. R. J. Mackin and W. R. Mills (private communication)
  24. J. Rotblat, Phys. Rev. 83, 1271 (1951)
  25. R. J. Mackin, Jr., Phys. Rev. 92, 529(A) (1953)
  26. Shire, Wormald, Lindsay-Jones, Lunden, and Stanley, Phil. Mag. 44, 1197 (1953)
  27. A. G. Stanley, Phil. Mag. 45, 430 (1954)
  28. Phillips, Cowie, and Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 83, 1049 (1951)
  29. G. Harries and W. T. Davies, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A65, 564 (1952)
  30. Beghian, Halban, Husain, and Sanders, Phys. Rev. 90, 1129 (1953)
  31. Dunbar, Pixley, Wenzel, and Whaling, Phys. Rev. 92, 649 (1953)
  32. G. Harries, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A67, 153 (1954)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation