All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Decays of Ta182 and Ta183

J. J. Murray*, F. Boehm, P. Marmier, and J. W. M. DuMond

  • California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

  • *Present address: Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Phys. Rev. 97, 1007 – Published 15 February, 1955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.97.1007

Abstract

The β decays of Ta182 and Ta183 into excited states of W182 and W183 have been studied using a curved crystal gamma-ray diffraction spectrometer and a homogeneous field, ring focusing beta-ray spectrometer. In each case de-excitation of the daughter nucleus gives rise to complex gamma-ray and conversion electron spectra. Energies and relative intensities of gamma rays and conversion lines arising from 27 transitions in W182 and 29 transitions in W183 are presented. Internal conversion coefficients and multipolarities have been deduced for most of the transitions and together with the gamma-ray energies form the basis of decay schemes proposed for both W182 and W183. The two decays are reported together because of the close experimental relationship which existed between them as a consequence of the method used for their production, namely, simultaneous production of Ta182 by single neutron capture and Ta183 by double neutron capture from stable Ta181. A corollary result is the value 1.3×104 barns for the thermal neutron cross section of Ta182.

An interpretation of these results on W182 in terms of collective rotational motion has been given by A. Bohr and collaborators [Kgl. Danske Videnscab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 29, No. 9 (1955)].

References (16)

  1. Muller, Hoyt, Klein, and DuMond, Phys. Rev. 88, 775 (1952)
  2. Cork, Childs, Branyan, Rutledge, and Stoddard, Phys. Rev. 81, 642 (1951) J. W. Mihelich, 95, 626 (1954) Fowler, Kruse, Keshishian, Klotz, and Mellor, 94, 1082 (1954)
  3. DuMond, Hoyt, Marmier, and Murray, Phys. Rev. 92, 202 (1953)
  4. Omitted endnote

  5. Omitted endnote

  6. DuMond, Kohl, Bogart, Muller, and Wilts, Office of Naval Research Special Technical Report, No. 16, March, 1952 (unpublished)
  7. J. W. M. DuMond, Rev. Sci. Instr. 20, 160 (1949)
  8. J. S. Osaba, Phys. Rev. 76, 345 (1949)
  9. Rose, Goertzel, Spinrad, Harr, and Strong, Phys. Rev. 83, 79 (1951)
  10. Gellman, Griffith, and Stanley, Phys. Rev. 85, 944 (1952)
  11. G. R. Fowles, Phys. Rev. 78, 744 (1950)
  12. McClelland, Mark, and Goodman, Phys. Rev. 93, 904 (1954)
  13. T. Huus et al. (to be published)
  14. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Phys. Rev. 90, 717 (1953)
  15. Alaga, Alder, Bohr, and Mottelson, "Intensity rules for nuclear data and gamma transitions to rotational states," Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 29, No. 9 (1955)
  16. J. W. Mihelich, Phys. Rev. 91, 427 (1953)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation