All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Spectrometer Studies of the Radiations of Neutron Deficient Isotopes of Cesium and of the E3 Isomers, Xe127m and Xe125m

Hirdaya B. Mathur* and Earl K. Hyde

  • Radiation Laboratory and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • *On leave of absence, Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Phys. Rev. 95, 708 – Published 1 August, 1954

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.708

Abstract

Cesium isotopes produced by I127(α, xn) type reactions in the 60-inch and 184-inch cyclotrons were studied in Geiger counters, a mass spectrometer, beta-ray spectrometers, a sodium iodide crystal scintillation spectrometer, and a gamma-gamma coincidence spectrometer. The mass assignment of 30-minute Cs130 was verified. The 6.25-hour Cs127 was shown to decay predominantly by electron capture but also by the emission of positrons of 1.063-Mev and 0.685-Mev energy. Prominent gamma rays of 125 and 406 kev are observed. Cs127 exhibits branching decay to 75-second Xe127m in about one disintegration in 104. This isomer was isolated and studied in a scintillation spectrometer. E3 radiation of 175 kev connecting h112 and d52 levels is followed by 125-kev M1 radiation corresponding to a d52d32 transition to the ground state. Forty-five minute Cs125 is shown to decay predominantly by electron capture and also by the emission of positrons of 2.05-Mev energy. Other lower energy positron groups are present. A prominent gamma ray of 112 kev is observed. In one disintegration in about 103, Cs125 decays to a 55-second Xe125m. This isomer emits gamma rays of 75 and 110 kev which are believed to be E3 h112d52 and M1 d52d32 transitions, respectively. An incomplete study of Cs123 shows it to be a 6-minute positron emitter.

References (21)

  1. Fink, Reynolds, and Templeton, Phys. Rev. 77, 614 (1950)
  2. J. R. Risser and R. N. Smith (private communication from K. Lark-Horowitz, 1948) Hollander, Perlman, and Seaborg, Revs. Modern Phys. 25, 469 (1953)
  3. Smith, Mitchell, and Caird, Phys. Rev. 87, 454 (1952)
  4. M. C. Michel and D. H. Templeton, Phys. Rev. 93, 1422 (1954)
  5. Wapstra, Verster, and Boelhouwer, Physica 19, 138 (1953)
  6. (private communication from A. H. Wapstra)
  7. A. H. Wapstra, Physica 19, 671 (1953)
  8. Creutz, Delasasso, Sutton, White, and Barkas, Phys. Rev. 58, 481 (1940)
  9. M. Goldhaber and A. W. Sunyar, Phys. Rev. 83, 906 (1951)
  10. I. Bergström, Arkiv Fysik 5, 191 (1952)
  11. M. Goldhaber and R. D. Hill, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 179 (1952)
  12. I. Bergström, Phys. Rev. 82, 111 (1951)
  13. E. K. Hyde, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 4181 (1952)
  14. F. F. Momyer, University of California Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-2060, 1953 (unpublished)
  15. W. E. Glenn, University of California Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-1628, January 1952 (unpublished)
  16. M. C. Michel and D. H. Templeton (to be published)
  17. N. Svartholm and K. Siegbahn, Arkiv. Mat. Astron. Fysik A33, No. 21 (1946) Hedgran, Siegbahn, and Svartholm, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A63, 960 (1950)
  18. F. Shull and D. Dennison, Phys. Rev. 71, 681 (1947) ibid.72, 256 (1947)
  19. G. D. O'Kelley, University of California Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-1243, March 1951 (unpublished)
  20. C. J. Borkowski, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-1336, September, 1952 (unpublished)
  21. A. Ghiorso and A. E. Larsh, Jr. (to be published)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation