- Access by Xinjiang University
Excited States of Even-Even Nuclei
Phys. Rev. 90, 587 – Published 15 May, 1953
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.90.587
Abstract
A general survey of excited states of even-even nuclei yields the following results: The excited state has usually a spin . For , the assignment is compatible with experimental results for 66 out of 68 nuclei investigated. For , of 26 nuclei investigated, about one-third have , one-third , and one-third miscellaneous spins of both even and odd parities. The energy of the first excited state plotted against the number of protons or neutrons in the nucleus varies rather smoothly and reaches maxima at closed shells. Wherever the first excited state is very low, e.g., in the rare earths region and for the heavy elements from thorium up, the one-particle model for odd nuclei is likely to break down except for the ground state. The lack of isomers of odd proton nuclei below magic number 82 may be due to this fact. The average energy of the first excited state of the even-even core in this region is of the order of 0.1 Mev, whereas this energy is of the order of 0.5 Mev for the core of the corresponding odd neutron nuclei (). Isomerism in even-even nuclei is discussed. The results are compared with theoretical predictions derived from an extended coupling model and from the liquid drop model of the nucleus.
References (30)
- M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75, 1894 (1949) ibid.78, 16 and 22 (1950)
- Haxel, Jensen, and Suess, Phys. Rev. 75, 1766 (1949)
- J. Rainwater, Phys. Rev. 79, 432 (1950)
- A. Bohr, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 26, 14 (1952)
- D. Kurath, Phys. Rev. 87, 218 (1952)
- B. H. Flowers, Phys. Rev. 86, 254 (1952) Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 215, 398 (1952)
- G. Scharff-Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 87, 218 (1952) Physica 18, 1105 (1952)
- J. E. Mack, Revs. Modern Phys. 22, 64 (1950)
- M. Goldhaber and A. W. Sunyar, Phys. Rev. 83, 906 (1951)
- Horie, Umezawa, Yamaguchi, and Yoshida [Prog. Theoret. Phys. 6, 254 (1951)]
- Devons, Hereward, and Lindsey, Nature 164, 586 (1949)
- Bowe, Goldhaber, Hill, Meyerhof, and Sala, Phys. Rev. 73, 1219 (1948)
- S. D. Drell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-792 (unpublished)
- M. Goldhaber and R. D. Hill, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 179 (1952)
- N. J. Hopkins, Phys. Rev. 88, 680 (1952)
- P. Preiswerk and P. Stähelin, Helv. Phys. Acta 24, 623 (1952)
- F. Asaro and I. Perlman, Phys. Rev. 87, 393 (1952)
- A. H. Wapstra [Physica 18, 799 (1952)]
- Rose, Goertzel, Spinrad, Harr, and Strong, Phys. Rev. 83, 79 (1951)
- J. W. Mihelich, Phys. Rev. 87, 646 (1952) Gellman, Griffith, and Stanley, 85, 944 (1952)
- V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 83, 1073 (1951)
- Daniels, Grace, and Robinson, Nature 168, 780 (1951) Gorter, Poppema, Steenland, and Benn, Physica 17, 1050 (1951)
- Bishop, Daniels, Goldschmidt, Halban, Kurti, and Robinson, Phys. Rev. 88, 1432 (1952)
- M. H. L. Pryce, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A65, 773 (1952)
- D. M. Dennison, Phys. Rev. 57, 454 (1940)
- H. J. Maehly and P. Stähelin, Helv. Phys. Acta 25, 624 (1952)
- D. C. Peaslee (unpublished)
- M. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 89, 1146 (1953)
- A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber (unpublished)
- K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 90, 29 (1953)