All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electron-Electron Scattering at 6.1 Mev

W. C. Barber, G. E. Becker*, and E. L. Chu

  • Microwave Laboratory, Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California

  • *Now at Hudson Laboratories, Columbia University, Dobbs Ferry, New York.

Phys. Rev. 89, 950 – Published 1 March, 1953

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.950

Abstract

The absolute differential cross section for the scattering of 6.1-Mev electrons by the electrons in a beryllium foil has been measured at 90 degrees and 109 degrees in the center-of-mass system. Electrons from a linear accelerator were first magnetically analyzed and then collimated to form the incident beam. Electron-electron scattering events were detected by end-window Geiger counters connected in coincidence. The counter with the defining aperture was connected in coincidence (1) with a counter at the conjugate scattering-angle, lying in the plane determined by the incident beam and the scattering direction to the defining counter; and (2), with another counter at the conjugate angle, but lying outside this plane, thus counting only accidental coincidences. The number of ee coincidences was then given by the difference between (1) and (2), with appreciable corrections arising from asymmetry in the background and from dead-time losses. These corrections required measurements of single and coincidence count rates with the scatterer in and out of the beam.

The result at 109 degrees was 4.4 percent lower than that predicted by the Møller theory, with a standard deviation based on the number of counts recorded of ±6 percent. At 90 degrees the expected standard deviation was ±2 percent, and here the experimental result was 8 percent below the theoretical. The latter result suggests the possibility that the Møller theory overestimates the cross section. However, consideration of the effects produced by radiative collisions, and of possible systematic errors in the experiment, leads to the conclusion that the experimental result is not incompatible with the Møller theory.

References (14)

  1. C. Møller, Ann. Physik 14, 531 (1932)
  2. N. F. Mott, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A126, 259 (1930)
  3. F. C. Champion, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A137, 688 (1932)
  4. Groetzinger, Leder, Ribe, and Berger, Phys. Rev. 79, 454 (1950)
  5. L. A. Page, Phys. Rev. 81, 1062 (1951)
  6. Scott, Hanson, and Lyman, Phys. Rev. 84, 638 (1951)
  7. Karr, Bondelid, and Mather, Phys. Rev. 81, 37 (1951)
  8. J. C. Street and R. H. Woodward, Phys. Rev. 46, 1029 (1934)
  9. W. Bothe, Z. Naturforsch. 4a, 542 (1949)
  10. H. S. Snyder and W. T. Scott, Phys. Rev. 76, 220 (1949)
  11. W. Heitler, Quantum Theory of Radiation (Oxford University Press, London, 1947), second edition, Appendix
  12. L. H. Lanzl and A. O. Hanson, Phys. Rev. 83, 959 (1951)
  13. R. Lomanitz, thesis, Dept. of Physics, Cornell University (unpublished)
  14. H. A. Bethe (private communication)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation