All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Meson Theory of β-Decay and the ΔL-Forbidden Transitions

Seitaro Nakamura

  • Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Phys. Rev. 89, 16 – Published 1 January, 1953

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.16

Abstract

Existence of the β-meson of vector type which is neither a π- nor μ-meson and which transmits the β-decay of nuclei has been tantatively assumed, the results thus derived being compared with experiments on β-decay. The differences between the β-meson theory and the phenomenological Fermi theory lie in the natural deduction of the vector interaction as well as the introduction of new nuclear matrix elements which are characteristic of the meson dipole. The selection rules for the ΔL-forbidden transitions are involved in these matrix elements, the orders of which are expected to be that of the unfavored parity transitions in each degree of forbidden transitions. The observability of a free β-meson is also discussed.

References (33)

  1. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan 17, 48 (1935), third series S. Sakata, 23, 291 (1941) ibid.24, 843 (1942) ibid.25, 86 (1943) H. A. Bethe and L. W. Nordheim, Phys. Rev. 57, 998 (1940)
  2. Taketani, Nakamura, Ono, and Sasaki, Phys. Rev. 76, 60 (1949) Nakamura, Fukuda, Ono, Sasaki, and Taketani, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 740 (1950)
  3. H. Yukawa, Revs. Modern Phys. 21, 474 (1949)
  4. J. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. 76, 1180 (1949)
  5. M. Ruderman and R. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. 76, 1458 (1949)
  6. H. L. Friedman and J. Rainwater, Phys. Rev. 84, 684 (1951)
  7. Sasaki, Nakamura, and Hayakawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 3, 454 (1948)
  8. T. Tanikawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 3, 315 (1948)
  9. E. R. Caianiello, Phys. Rev. 81, 625 (1951)
  10. C. S. Wu, Revs. Modern Phys. 22, 386 (1950) I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev. 82, 333 (1951)
  11. E. J. Konopinski, Revs. Modern Phys. 15, 209 (1945)
  12. E. J. Konopinski and E. Uhlenbeck, Phys. Rev. 60, 308 (1941)
  13. A. M. Smith, Phys. Rev. 82, 955 (1951)
  14. L. W. Nordheim, Revs. Modern Phys. 23, 327 (1951)
  15. L. M. Langer, Phys. Rev. 84, 1059 (1951) Nakamura, Umezawa, and Takebe, 83, 1273 (1951)
  16. J. D. Seagrave, Phys. Rev. 85, 197 (1952)
  17. Mayer, Moszkowski, and Nordheim, Revs. Modern Phys. 23, 315 (1951) L. W. Nordheim, 23, 322 (1951)
  18. H. Brysk. Phvs. Rev. 84, 362 (1951)
  19. Mayer, Moszkowski, and Nordheim, Revs. Modern Phys. 23, 315 (1951) L. W. Nordheim, Phys. Rev. 75, 1894 (1949)
  20. E. Feenberg and K. C. Hammack, Phys. Rev. 75, 1877 (1949)
  21. S. A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. 82, 118 (1951) [21]
  22. H. Horie and M. Umezawa, Phys. Rev. 83, 1253 (1951)
  23. E. J. Konopinski and L. M. Langer, in Annual Reviews of Nuclear Science, Vol. 2, (Annual Reviews, Inc., Stanford) in press
  24. S. Nakamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. (to be published)
  25. T. Ahrens and E. Feenberg, Phys. Rev. 86, 64 (1952)
  26. A. G. Petschek and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. 85, 698 (1952) E. C. Nelson, 60, 830 (1941) T. Miyazima, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan (in Japanese) 16, 340 (1941) F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 73, 929 (1948)
  27. [9] H. A. Bethe and L. W. Nordheim, Phys. Rev. 57, 998 (1940)
  28. R. J. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. 72, 415 (1947) Fukuda, Hayakawa, and Miyamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 283, 352 (1950) Ozaki, Oneda, and Sasaki, 5, 25, 165 (1950)
  29. Bunker, Langer, and Moffat, Phys. Rev. 80, 468 (1950)
  30. E. Kondaiah, Arkiv Fys. 4, No. 2 (1951)
  31. Nakamura, Umezawa, and Takebe, Phys. Rev. 84, 865 (1951)
  32. A. G. Petschek and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. 85, 698 (1952)
  33. Taketani, Umezawa, Nakamura, and Ono, Prog. Theor. Phys. (to be published)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation