- Access by Xinjiang University
The Magnetic Moment of and the Hyperfine Structure Anomaly of the Potassium Isotopes
Phys. Rev. 86, 73 – Published 1 April, 1952
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.86.73
Abstract
The nuclear magnetic moment and atomic hyperfine splitting of the rare isotope have been measured by the atomic beam magnetic resonance technique. Detection of atoms, from a source of normal potassium, was achieved by employing a conventional surface ionization detector as the ion source for a mass spectrometer, and by utilizing an electron multiplier to count the ions. By measuring the frequencies of appropriate lines in the Zeeman pattern, the nuclear moment was determined to be nuclear magnetons. The hyperfine splitting in the ground state was redetermined, with higher precision than that of previous measurements, to be Mc/sec.
The ratio of the nuclear factors of and was measured directly by observing, in the same homogeneous magnetic field, , the frequencies of two lines (a doublet) in the Zeeman spectrum of each isotope. The doublet separation of these lines is, in each case, proportional to , so that the ratio of the doublet splittings yielded directly . From these results and from the previously measured , the hyperfine structure anomaly of these K isotopes is
The theory of the hyperfine structure anomaly, as developed by A. Bohr and V. F. Weisskopf, has been applied to the interpretation of this result. The predictions of a number of specific models, previously suggested to account for the observed nuclear factors, have been compared with this experiment and with previous results on the anomalies for the Rb and the abundant K isotopes. The "asymmetric core" model of A. Bohr gives the best over-all agreement, mainly on the basis of the — anomaly. In general, all models which are, in their essential features, based on the independent-particle model with spin-orbit coupling, give predictions in fair qualitative agreement with the experiments. The contribution of to the hfs anomaly seems, however, to be (fortuitously) insensitive to the differences between the models investigated.
References (28)
- E. Fermi and E. G. Segrè, Z. Physik 82, 729 (1933)
Omitted endnote
- H. Kopferman, Kernmomente (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, M.B.H., Leipzig, 1940), p. 17
- A. Bohr and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 77, 94 (1950)
- F. Bitter, Phys. Rev. 76, 150 (1949)
- Ochs, Logan, and Kusch, Phys. Rev. 78, 184 (1950)
- J. R. Zacharias, Phys. Rev. 61, 270 (1942) Davis, Nagle, and Zacharias, 76, 1068 (1949)
- P. Kusch and H. Taub, Phys. Rev. 75, 1477 (1949)
- T. L. Collins, Phys. Rev. 80, 103 (1950)
- G. Breit and I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 38, 2072 (1931)
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
- Rabi, Kellog, and Zacharias, Phys. Rev. 46, 157 (1934)
- H. Lew, Phys. Rev. 76, 1086 (1949)
- W. E. Lamb, Phys. Rev. 60, 817 (1941)
- J. H. Gardner and E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 76, 1262 (1949)
- S. Millman and P. Kusch, Phys. Rev. 58, 438 (1940)
- A. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 81, 134 (1951)
- A. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 81, 331 (1951)
- M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 78, 16, 22 (1950)
- F. Bloch, Phys. Rev. 83, 839 (1951)
- A. de Shalit, Helv. Phys. Acta 24, 296 (1951)
- H. Miyazawa, Prog. Theoret. Phys. 6, 263 (1951)
- Private communication. Professor E. Feenberg
- H. Margenau and E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 58, 103 (1940)
- Private communication. Dr. A. Bohr