- Access by Xinjiang University
Ionization Chamber Study of the Disintegration of and by Thermal Neutrons
Phys. Rev. 77, 641 – Published 1 March, 1950
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.77.641
Abstract
The total ionization produced by the reactions and in a gas mixture consisting mainly of argon was measured by means of a cylindrical ionization chamber operated under conditions of electron collection. High resolution was achieved by suitable choice of chamber geometry and by use of a low noise level amplifier. The total ionization charges collected from polonium alpha-particles, from the disintegration products of and from those of are found to be in the ratio 1:0.145±0.002:0.119±0.001, respectively. Comparison with polonium alpha-particles on the assumption of a constant average energy per ion pair in argon then yields reaction energies of 766±10 kev for and 630±6 kev for . The difference between these energies agrees well with the difference between the end points of the beta-ray spectra of and . This agreement supports the assumption of a proportionality between energy and ionization in argon independent of particle type. A value of 785±6 kev is computed for the neutron-hydrogen mass difference from these data.
References (27)
- J. K. Boggild, Kgl. Danske Vid. Sels. Math.-fys. Medd. 23, 22 (1945)
- D. J. Hughes and C. Eggler, Phys. Rev. 73, 809 (1948)
- Cornog, Franzen, and Stephens, Phys. Rev. 74, 1 (1948)
- Bridge, Hazen, Rossi, and Williams, Phys. Rev. 74, 1084 (1948)
- P. G. Koontz and T. A. Hall, Rev. Sci. Inst. 18, 643 (1947)
- O. Erbacher, Zeits. f. physik Chemie A156, 142 (1931)
- M. Sands, LADC 82
- W. C. Elmore, Nucleonics 2, No. 3, 16 (1948)
- Coon, Goldblatt, Nobles, and Robinson, AECD 2190
- J. H. Coon and R. A. Nobles, Phys. Rev. 75, 1358 (1949)
- L. O. P. King and L. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. 75, 1366 (1949)
- Batchelor, Epstein, Flowers and Whittaker, Nature 163, 211 (1949)
- (a) W. P. Jesse and H. Forstat, Phys. Rev. 74, 1259(A) (1948) (b) W. P. Jesse and J. Sadauskis, 75, 1110 (1949)
- T. E. Cranshaw and J. A. Harvey, Can. J. Research 26, 243 (1948)
- L. H. Gray, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 40, 72 (1944)
- M. G. Holloway and M. S. Livingston, Phys. Rev. 54, 18 (1938)
- [Franzen, Halpern, and Stephens, Phys. Rev. 76, 317 (1949)]
- [13]
- Stebler, Huber, and Bichsel, Helv. Phys. Acta 22, 362 (1949)
- G. C. Hanna and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev. 75, 983 (1949)
- Curran, Angus, and Cockroft, Phil. Mag. 40, 53 (1949) Phys. Rev. 76, 853 (1949)
- Cook, Langer, and Price, Phys. Rev. 74, 548 (1948)
- Shoupp, Jennings, and Sun, Phys. Rev. 75, 1 (1949)
- Taschek, Jarvis, Argo, and Hemmendinger, Phys. Rev. 76, 325 (1949)
- R. E. Bell and L. G. Elliott, Phys. Rev. 74, 1552 (1948)
- W. R. Cohen and W. F. Hornyak, Phys. Rev. 72, 1127 (1947)
- Tollestrup, Jenkins, Fowler, and Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 75, 1947 (1949)