- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Journals Archive

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Systematics of Alpha-Radioactivity

I. Perlman, A. Ghiorso, and G. T. Seaborg

  • Radiation Laboratory and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California

PDF

Phys. Rev. 77, 26 – Published 1 January, 1950

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.77.26

Abstract

Correlations of alpha-decay energies in terms of mass number and atomic number have been made for all of the alpha-emitting species now numbering over 100. For each element isotopes show increase in alpha-energy with decrease in mass number except in the region of 126 neutrons where there is an explainable reversal. This reversal has the effect of creating a region of relatively low alpha-energy and long half-life at low mass numbers for such elements as astatine, emanation, francium, and possibly higher elements as had been noted already for bismuth and polonium. Methods and examples of using alpha-decay data to define the energy surface in the heavy element region are discussed. The regularities in alpha-decay are used for predictions of nuclear properties including predictions of the beta-stable nuclides among the heavy elements.

The half-life vs. energy correlations show that the even-even nuclides conform well with existing alpha-decay theory, but all nuclear types with odd nucleons show prohibited decay. The reason for this prohibition is not found in spin changes in the alpha-emission but in the assembly of the components of the alpha-particle, and this theory is discussed further in terms of observations made on nuclides having two or more alpha-groups. Using most of the even-even nuclei to define "normal nuclear radius" calculations are now able to show the shrinkage in the regions of lead and of 126 neutrons to amount to about 10 percent. The much greater change in "effective radius" for bismuth isotopes can be dissociated into the effects of odd nucleons superimposed on the actual decrease in nuclear radius. The simple expression r=1.48A13·10−13 cm seems to fit the data for the even-even nuclei outside of the region of 126 neutrons better than more complex functions.

View figure in article

References (74)

  1. H. Geiger and J. M. Nuttall, Phil. Mag. 22, 613 (1911) ibid.23, 439 (1912)
  2. G. Gamow, Zeits. f. Physik 51, 204 (1928) G. GamowStructure of Atomic Nuclei and Nuclear Transformations (Oxford University Press, London, 1937) E. U. Condon and R. W. Gurney, Phys. Rev. 33, 127 (1929) Nature 122, 439 (1928) H. A. Bethe, Revs. Mod. Phys. 9, 161 (1937)
  3. G. T. Seaborg and I. Perlman, Revs. Mod. Phys. 20, 585 (1948)
  4. [3]
  5. Hagemann, Katzin, Studier, Ghiorso, and Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 72, 252 (1947)
  6. English, Cranshaw, Demers, Harvey, Hincks, Jelley, and May, Phys. Rev. 72, 253 (1947)
  7. M. H. Studier and E. K. Hyde, Phys. Rev. 74, 591 (1948)
  8. Ghiorso, Meinke, and Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 74, 695 (1948) Meinke, Ghiorso, and Seaborg, 75, 314 (1949)
  9. Templeton, Howland, and Perlman, Phys. Rev. 72, 527 (1947) D. H. Templeton and I. Perlman, 73, 1211 (1948)
  10. Perlman, Ghiorso, and Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 74, 1730 (1948) ibid.75, 1096 (1949)
  11. G. Fournier, Comptes Rendus 184, 878 (1927) K. Fajans, Radioelements and Isotopes (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1931), Chapter I
  12. J. Schintlmeister, Wien. Chem. Zeits. 46, 106 (1943)
  13. A. Berthelot, J. de phys. et rad. VIII, 3, 17 (1942)
  14. B. Karlik, Acta Phys. Austriaca 2, 182 (1948)
  15. A. H. Wapstra, Nature 161, 529 (1948)
  16. E. Glueckauf, Proc. Phys. Soc. 61, 25 (1948)
  17. H. A. Bethe and R. F. Bacher, Revs. Mod. Phys. 8, 82 (1936) (pp. 104 and 165)
  18. N. Bohr and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1939)
  19. T. P. Kohman, Phys. Rev. 76, 448 (1949)
  20. (D. G. Karraker and D. H. Templeton, unpublished data) (H. M. Neumann and I. Perlman, unpublished)
  21. H. M. Neumann and I. Perlman (unpublished)
  22. E. Broda and N. Feather, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A190, 20 (1947)
  23. Thompson, Ghiorso, Rasmussen, and Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 76, 1406 (1949)
  24. D. G. Karraker and D. H. Templeton, unpublished data
  25. W. Elsasser, J. de phys. et rad. 5, 625 (1934)
  26. M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 74, 235 (1948)
  27. Ghiorso, Meinke, and Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 76, 1414 (1949)
  28. Hyde, Ghiorso, and Seaborg (unpublished)
  29. S. G. Thompson, Phys. Rev. 76, 319 (1949)
  30. N. Feather and H. O. W. Richardson, Proc. Phys. Soc. 61, 452 (1948)
  31. M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949)
  32. L. W. Nordheim, Phys. Rev. 75, 1894 (1949)
  33. E. Feenberg and K. C. Hammack, Phys. Rev. 75, 1877 (1949)
  34. B. Karlik and T. Bernert, Zeits. f. Physik 123, 51 (1944)
  35. N. Feather, Nucleonics 5, 22 (1949)
  36. S. Biswas and A. Mukherjee, Ind. J. Phys. 22, 80 (1948)
  37. A. J. Dempster, Phys. Rev. 73, 1125 (1948)
  38. A. Berthelot, J. de phys. et rad. VIII 3, 52 (1942)
  39. S. Biswas, Ind. J. Phys. 23, 51 (1949)
  40. O. E. Andersen and H. E. White, Phys. Rev. 71, 911 (1947)
  41. H. Schüler and H. Gollnow, Naturwiss. 22, 511 (1934)
  42. International Radium Standards Commission Report of 1930 Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 427 (1931)
  43. H. A. Bethe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 163 (1937)
  44. E. Amaldi and B. N. Cacciapuoti, Phys. Rev. 71, 739 (1947)
  45. K. Street, Jr. and G. T. Seaborg, unpublished data
  46. S. G. Thompson, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California (1948) "Nuclear and Chemical Properties of Americium and Curium."
  47. Goeckermann, Robinson, and Stover, unpublished data
  48. R. A. James and K. Street, Jr., unpublished data
  49. D. A. Orth and G. T. Seaborg, unpublished data
  50. R. A. James, unpublished data
  51. Magnussen, Thompson, and Seaborg, unpublished data
  52. Clark, Spencer-Palmer, and Woodward, British Atomic Energy Project Report, BR-522 (1944)
  53. Crane, Ghiorso, and Perlman, unpublished data
  54. S. Rosenblum and E. Cotton, Comptes Rendus 226, 171 (1948)
  55. W. W. Meinke, and G. T. Seaborg, unpublished data
  56. Rosenblum, Valadares, and Vial, Comptes Rendus 227, 1088 (1948)
  57. A. G. Ward, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 35, 322 (1939)
  58. I. Curie, Comptes Rendus 227, 1225 (1948)
  59. Rosenblum, Valadares, and Perey, Comptes Rendus 228, 385 (1949)
  60. G. Guében, Ann. soc. sci. Bruxelles B52, 60 (1932) ibid.B53, 115 (1933)
  61. R. G. Gregoire and M. Perey, Comptes Rendus 225, 733 (1947)
  62. L. Vigneron, Comptes Rendus 226, 715 (1948)
  63. Ghiorso, Hollander, and Perlman, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Document, AECD-2232 (1948)
  64. O. Hahn and L. Meitner, Zeits. f. Physik 26, 161 (1924)
  65. E. Stahel, Comptes Rendus 194, 608 (1932)
  66. S. Rosenblum and J. Perrin, Comptes Rendus 195, 317 (1932)
  67. S. Rosenblum, Nucleonics 4, 38 (1949)
  68. W. Y. Chang, Phys. Rev. 70, 632 (1946)
  69. R. Walen, Comptes Rendus 227, 1090 (1948)
  70. Weissbluth, Putnam, and Segrè, private communication (July 1948)
  71. E. L. Kelley and E. Segrè, Phys. Rev. 75, 999 (1949)
  72. Barton, Ghiorso, and Perlman, unpublished data
  73. A. Ghiorso, unpublished data
  74. Neumann, Howland, and Perlman, unpublished data

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. 77, 26– Published 1 January, 1950
  • Received 26 September 1949

© 1950 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation