- Access by Xinjiang University
On The Two-Meson
Phys. Rev. 76, 60 – Published 1 July, 1949
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.76.60
Abstract
Main consequences of the two-meson theory by Marshak and Bethe on the one hand and that by Sakata are compared with experiments concerning - and -mesons. It is shown that the pair type interaction between -mesons and nucleons in "M. B." theory contradicts with frequent occurrence of stars produced by -mesons, whereas the assumption in Sakata theory that -mesons with spin 0 or 1 are responsible for nuclear forces does not. Although the smaller range for the nuclear forces thus obtained from the latter theory is not at variance with the high energy neutron-proton scattering experiment, deuteron quadrupole moment cannot be accounted for by a -meson field alone, so that the admixture of another meson field with larger range is necessitated. Both -decay and -nuclear capture can be consistently accounted for by assuming spin ½ for -mesons as in Sakata theory. However, nuclear -decay and -decay have to be considered as direct processes as in Fermi's theory of -decay, instead of indirect processes through virtual emission and absorption of -mesons as assumed usually in the meson theory.
References (12)
- reported at the Annual Meeting of the Physical Society of Japan at Kyoto University, May 23, 1948
- S. Sakata and T. Inoue, Prog. Theo. Phys. 1, 143 (1946) S. Sakata, Symposium on the Meson Theory at Tokyo, 1943
- R. E. Marshak, and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 72, 506 (1947)
- C. M. G. Lattes, G. P. S. Occhialini, and C. F. Powell, Nature 160, 453, 486 (1947)
- E. Gardner and C. M. G. Lattes, Science 109, 270 (1948)
- Lavatelli, Long, Snyder, and Williams, Phys. Rev. 72, 1147 (1947) C. G. Shull, E. O. Wollan, G. A. Morton, and W. L. Davidson, 73, 262, 842 (1948)
- L. I. Foldy, Phys. Rev. 72, 125 (1947)
Omitted endnote
- M. Conversi, E. Pancini, and O. Piccioni, Phys. Rev. 71, 209 (1947)
- R. F. Christy and S. Kusaka, Phys. Rev. 59, 414 (1941)
- H. Yukawa and S. Sakata, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan 17, 467 (1935) ibid.18, 128 (1936)
- E. C. Nelson, Phys. Rev. 60, 830 (1941)