All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Free to Read
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Relaxation Effects in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Absorption

N. Bloembergen*, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound

  • Lyman Laboratory of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

  • *Present address: Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, University of Leiden.
  • Society of Fellows.

Phys. Rev. 73, 679 – Published 1 April, 1948

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.679

Abstract

The exchange of energy between a system of nuclear spins immersed in a strong magnetic field, and the heat reservoir consisting of the other degrees of freedom (the "lattice") of the substance containing the magnetic nuclei, serves to bring the spin system into equilibrium at a finite temperature. In this condition the system can absorb energy from an applied radiofrequency field. With the absorption of energy, however, the spin temperature tends to rise and the rate of absorption to decrease. Through this "saturation" effect, and in some cases by a more direct method, the spin-lattice relaxation time T1 can be measured. The interaction among the magnetic nuclei, with which a characteristic time T2 is associated, contributes to the width of the absorption line. Both interactions have been studied in a variety of substances, but with the emphasis on liquids containing hydrogen.

Magnetic resonance absorption is observed by means of a radiofrequency bridge; the magnetic field at the sample is modulated at a low frequency. A detailed analysis of the method by which T1 is derived from saturation experiments is given. Relaxation times observed range from 104 to 102 seconds. In liquids T1 ordinarily decreases with increasing viscosity, in some cases reaching a minimum value after which it increases with further increase in viscosity. The line width meanwhile increases monotonically from an extremely small value toward a value determined by the spin-spin interaction in the rigid lattice. The effect of paramagnetic ions in solution upon the proton relaxation time and line width has been investigated. The relaxation time and line width in ice have been measured at various temperatures.

The results can be explained by a theory which takes into account the effect of the thermal motion of the magnetic nuclei upon the spin-spin interaction. The local magnetic field produced at one nucleus by neighboring magnetic nuclei, or even by electronic magnetic moments of paramagnetic ions, is spread out into a spectrum extending to frequencies of the order of 1τc, where τc is a correlation time associated with the local Brownian motion and closely related to the characteristic time which occurs in Debye's theory of polar liquids. If the nuclear Larmor frequency ω is much less than 1τc, the perturbations caused by the local field nearly average out, T1 is inversely proportional to τc, and the width of the resonance line, in frequency, is about 1T1. A similar situation is found in hydrogen gas where τc is the time between collisions. In very viscous liquids and in some solids where ωτc>1, a quite different behavior is predicted, and observed. Values of τc for ice, inferred from nuclear relaxation measurements, correlate well with dielectric dispersion data.

Formulas useful in estimating the detectability of magnetic resonance absorption in various cases are derived in the appendix.

References (31)

  1. Nature 160, 475 (1947)
  2. W. Heitler and E. Teller, Proc. Roy. Soc. 155A, 629 (1936)
  3. E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 69, 37 (1946)
  4. F. Bloch, W. W. Hansen, and M. Packard, Phys. Rev. 70, 474 (1946)
  5. B. V. Rollin, Nature 158, 669 (1946) B. V. Rollin and J. Hatton, 159, 201 (1947)
  6. B. V. Rollin, J. Hatton, A. H. Cooke, and R. J. Benzie, Nature 160, 457 (1947)
  7. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev. 70, 460 (1946)
  8. C. J. Gorter and L. J. F. Broer, Physica 9, 591 (1942)
  9. M. E. Rose, Phys. Rev. 53, 715 (1938)
  10. G. E. Valley and H. Wallman, Vacuum Tube Amplifiers, Radiation Laboratory Series (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, in press), Vol. 18
  11. R. H. Dicke, Rev. Sci. Inst. 17, 268 (1946)
  12. H. C. Torrey (private communication)
  13. E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946) Heitler and Teller, [2]
  14. L. J. F. Broer, Physica 10, 801 (1943)
  15. J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. (in press)
  16. G. E. Pake, J. Chem. Phys. (in press)
  17. E. M. Purcell, N. Bloembergen, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 70, 988 (1946)
  18. I. Waller, Zeits. f. Physik 79, 370 (1932)
  19. L. J. F. Broer, Thesis (Amsterdam 1945), p. 56 ff
  20. V. Weisskopf and E. Wigner, Zeits. f. Physik 63, 54 (1930) ibid.65, 18 (1930)
  21. Ming Chen Wang and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 323 (1945)
  22. P. Debye, Polar Molecules (Dover Publications, New York, 1945), Chapter V
  23. J. A. Saxton, Radio Research Board Report C115 (declassified), D.S.I.R., March 20, 1945. (This is a British report.)
  24. G. J. Gorter, Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 1947), p. 4 J. H. Van Vleck, Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities (Oxford University Press, New York, 1932), Chapter XI
  25. R. L. Cummerow, D. Halliday, and G. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. 72, 1233 (1947)
  26. E. Zavoisky, J. Phys. USSR 9, 211 (1945)
  27. E. M. Purcell, R. V. Pound, and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. 70, 986 (1946)
  28. J. M. B. Kellogg, I. I. Rabi, N. F. Ramsey, and J. R. Zacharias, Phys. Rev. 57, 677 (1940)
  29. Linus Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1940), p. 302 ff
  30. F. Bitter, N. L. Alpert, H. L. Poss, C. G. Lehr, and S. T. Lin, Phys. Rev. 71, 738 (1947) N. L. Alpert, 72, 637 (1947)
  31. H. T. Friis, Proc. I.R.E. 32, 419 (1944)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation