All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Disintegration Schemes of Radioactive Substances IX. Mn52 and V48

Wendell C. Peacock and Martin Deutsch

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Phys. Rev. 69, 306 – Published 1 April, 1946

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.306

Abstract

The radiations emitted in the decay of Mn5225 (6.5 day) and of V4823 have been investigated by spectrometer and coincidence methods. Mn52 decays with the emission of positrons of maximum energy 0.582±0.015 Mev, followed by three gamma-rays in cascade, of energies 0.734±0.015 Mev, 0.940±0.02 Mev, and 1.46±0.03 Mev, respectively. These energies are the multiples 3, 4, and 6 of 0.240 Mev, within the experimental errors. The orbital electron capture by Mn52 leads to the same excited state of Cr52 as the positron emission with which it competes. The positrons of V48 are emitted with a maximum energy of 0.716±0.015 Mev, with successive emission of two gamma-rays of 1.33±0.03 Mev and 0.980±0.02 Mev energy. These gamma-ray energies are in the ratio 4:3. From the disintegration schemes one finds the mass differences between neutral atoms: Mn52-Cr52 = 5.10±0.15×103 a.m.u. and V48-Ti48 = 4.37±0.12×103 a.m.u. Some evidence is also presented concerning the disintegration of V52 and of Sc48. The energy levels of Cr52 and Ti48 identified in the radioactive processes are compared with those found by other methods. The disintegration energies of several nuclei studied are examined with a view to their dependence on atomic weight. It is shown that beta-ray theory explains consistently the lifetimes, the shapes of the positron spectra, and the ratio of electron capture to positron emission if one assumes tensor interaction, angular momentum change ΔI=0 or ΔI=±1 (not 0→0) without parity change in the case of Mn52 and with parity change in the case of V48.

References (18)

  1. Phys. Rev. 64, 321 (1943) Phys. Rev. 65, 211 (1944) Phys. Rev.68, 193 (1945)
  2. M. Deutsch, L. G. Elliott, and R. D. Evans, Rev. Sci. Inst. 15, 178 (1944)
  3. J. J. Livingood and G. T. Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 54, 391 (1938)
  4. A. Hemmendinger, Phys. Rev. 58, 929 (1940)
  5. W. M. Good, D. Peaslee, M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. 69, 313 (1946)
  6. J. Martelly, Comptes rendus 216, 838 (1944)
  7. G. T. Seaborg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 16, 1 (1944)
  8. H. J. Walke, Phys. Rev. 52, 669, 777 (1937) Proc. Roy. Soc. 171, 360 (1939)
  9. J. R. Richardson, Phys. Rev. 53, 124 (1938)
  10. C. T. Hibdon, M. L. Pool, and J. D. Kurbatov, Phys. Rev. 65, 351 (1944)
  11. G. P. Smith, Phys. Rev. 61, 578 (1942)
  12. C. E. Mandeville, Phys. Rev. 64, 147 (1943)
  13. C. T. Hibdon, M. L. Pool, and J. D. Kurbatov, Phys. Rev. 63, 462 (1943)
  14. H. J. Walke, Phys. Rev. 57, 163 (1940)
  15. E. Pollard, Phys. Rev. 54, 411 (1938)
  16. R. H. Dicke and J. Marshall, Jr., Phys. Rev. 63, 86 (1943)
  17. M. L. Wiedenbeck, Phys. Rev. 67, 92 (1945)
  18. G. T. Seaborg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 16, 1 (1944)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation