- Access by Xinjiang University
Disintegration Schemes of Radioactive Substances IX. and
Phys. Rev. 69, 306 – Published 1 April, 1946
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.306
Abstract
The radiations emitted in the decay of (6.5 day) and of have been investigated by spectrometer and coincidence methods. decays with the emission of positrons of maximum energy 0.582±0.015 Mev, followed by three gamma-rays in cascade, of energies 0.734±0.015 Mev, 0.940±0.02 Mev, and 1.46±0.03 Mev, respectively. These energies are the multiples 3, 4, and 6 of 0.240 Mev, within the experimental errors. The orbital electron capture by leads to the same excited state of as the positron emission with which it competes. The positrons of are emitted with a maximum energy of 0.716±0.015 Mev, with successive emission of two gamma-rays of 1.33±0.03 Mev and 0.980±0.02 Mev energy. These gamma-ray energies are in the ratio 4:3. From the disintegration schemes one finds the mass differences between neutral atoms: - = 5.10±0.15× a.m.u. and - = 4.37±0.12× a.m.u. Some evidence is also presented concerning the disintegration of and of . The energy levels of and identified in the radioactive processes are compared with those found by other methods. The disintegration energies of several nuclei studied are examined with a view to their dependence on atomic weight. It is shown that beta-ray theory explains consistently the lifetimes, the shapes of the positron spectra, and the ratio of electron capture to positron emission if one assumes tensor interaction, angular momentum change or (not 0→0) without parity change in the case of and with parity change in the case of .
References (18)
- Phys. Rev. 64, 321 (1943) Phys. Rev. 65, 211 (1944) Phys. Rev.68, 193 (1945)
- M. Deutsch, L. G. Elliott, and R. D. Evans, Rev. Sci. Inst. 15, 178 (1944)
- J. J. Livingood and G. T. Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 54, 391 (1938)
- A. Hemmendinger, Phys. Rev. 58, 929 (1940)
- W. M. Good, D. Peaslee, M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. 69, 313 (1946)
- J. Martelly, Comptes rendus 216, 838 (1944)
- G. T. Seaborg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 16, 1 (1944)
- H. J. Walke, Phys. Rev. 52, 669, 777 (1937) Proc. Roy. Soc. 171, 360 (1939)
- J. R. Richardson, Phys. Rev. 53, 124 (1938)
- C. T. Hibdon, M. L. Pool, and J. D. Kurbatov, Phys. Rev. 65, 351 (1944)
- G. P. Smith, Phys. Rev. 61, 578 (1942)
- C. E. Mandeville, Phys. Rev. 64, 147 (1943)
- C. T. Hibdon, M. L. Pool, and J. D. Kurbatov, Phys. Rev. 63, 462 (1943)
- H. J. Walke, Phys. Rev. 57, 163 (1940)
- E. Pollard, Phys. Rev. 54, 411 (1938)
- R. H. Dicke and J. Marshall, Jr., Phys. Rev. 63, 86 (1943)
- M. L. Wiedenbeck, Phys. Rev. 67, 92 (1945)
- G. T. Seaborg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 16, 1 (1944)