All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

The Apparent Breakdown of Meek's Streamer Criterion in Divergent Gaps due to the Failure of Townsend's Ionization Function

Leon H. Fisher* and Gerhard L. Weissler

  • Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • *Now at the University of New Mexico.
  • Now at the University of California Hospital.

Phys. Rev. 66, 95 – Published 1 September, 1944

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.66.95

Abstract

Meek's criterion postulates that a streamer will propagate if the positive ion space charge field close to the anode is equal to K times the impressed field, where K should be a constant independent of gap configuration and pressure. Measurements in confocal paraboloid gaps, designed to substantiate this, revealed that K was not constant, but decreased with decreasing pressures. Morton showed that on a negatively charged smaller electrode Townsend's ionization functions do not represent the ionization produced in divergent fields. Consequently it was believed that the calculations of the space charge field of the positive ions produced in such gaps must be inaccurate in view of this erroneous assumption. A series of measurements on the dark current i in the same gap showed that it was not represented by i=i0 exp [αdx] at lower pressures. The trend and the apparent quantitative variation of K with pressure is explained if the apparent i0 versus voltage curves are extrapolated to streamer onset for each pressure. Thus for practical purposes under the conditions studied K is sensibly constant in conformity with Meek's theory. Per contra, the applications of Meek's theory to gaps with very divergent fields where the currents can be expected to deviate markedly from those computed by the relation i=i0 exp [αdx] are not justified, thus placing a practical limitation on the use of Meek's theory to streamer studies. Roughly this phenomenon appears when the change of the field exceeds two percent change over an average electron free path.

References (17)

  1. J. M. Meek, Phys. Rev. 57, 722 (1940)
  2. L. B. Loeb and J. M. Meek, The Mechanism of the Electric Spark (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1941)
  3. A. F. Kip, Phys. Rev. 54, 139 (1938) G. W. Trichel, ibid. 55, 382 (1939) L. B. Loeb and A. F. Kip, J. App. Phys. 10, 142 (1939)
  4. H. Raether, Zeits. f. Physik 107, 91 (1937) ibid.110, 611 (1938) ibid.112, 464 (1939) H. Costa, ibid. 113, 531 (1939)
  5. [2], page 52
  6. L. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 65, 153 (1944)
  7. K. E. Fitzsimmons, Phys. Rev. 61, 175 (1942)
  8. P. L. Morton, Thesis, University of California Library, Berkeley, California
  9. G. L. Weissler, Phys. Rev. 63, 96 (1943)
  10. [2], page 45
  11. F. H. Sanders, Phys. Rev. 41, 667 (1932) ibid.44, 1020 (1933)
  12. D. H. Hale, Phys. Rev. 54, 241 (1938) ibid.56, 815 (1939)
  13. H. Ramien, Zeits. f. Physik 70, 351 (1931)
  14. H. L. Brose and Saayman, Ann. d. Physik 5, 797 (1930)
  15. A. F. Kip, Phys. Rev. 54, 139 (1938)
  16. N. E. Bradbury, Phys. Rev. 40, 980 (1932) L. B. Loeb, Fundamental Processes of Electrical Discharges in Gases (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1939), Chapter 7
  17. L. B. Loeb, Phys. Rev. 48, 684 (1935)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation