All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Hindered Rotation in Methyl Alcohol

James S. Koehler and David M. Dennison

  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Phys. Rev. 57, 1006 – Published 1 June, 1940

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.57.1006

Abstract

The problem of hindered rotation in methyl alcohol is discussed in relation to a model in which a rigid OH bar may rotate about the axis of a rigid pyramid representing the CH3 group under the action of a hindering potential of the form V=12H(1cos3x). The wave equation is separated into a Mathieu equation governing the internal motion and a symmetrical rotator equation which describes the rotation of the whole molecule. The Mathieu functions, because of a coupling between the internal motion and the rotation of the entire system, obey quasi-periodic boundary conditions. A qualitative treatment is given of the behavior of the energy levels as the barrier height H, is raised from zero to infinity. An exact method of calculating the energy levels, the wave functions, and the transition probabilities is devised which involves finding the roots of certain continued fractions. It is shown that the levels lying well below the barrier, which may be described as vibrational levels, are each split into three components whose spread is dependent upon the penetrability of the barrier. The positions of the three components of a level are periodic functions of the variable σ=KC1C (C1 and C are moments of inertia and K is a quantum number having integral values.) Examining levels in the order of increasing energy, the levels which lie above the barrier rapidly take on the character of states found in free rotation. A set of numerical calculations of the levels and of the resulting spectrum are made with a barrier height of 770 cm1. The qualitative features of the theoretical spectrum appear to be in agreement with the observations of Borden and Barker and those of Lawson and Randall, but a comparison indicates that the barrier height is probably lower, about 470±40 cm1. Further experimental work, particularly in the far infra-red, should determine the barrier height more exactly in which case better correlation between the predicted and measured spectra may be expected.

References (9)

  1. E. Teller and B. Topley, J. Chem. Soc. 885 (1935) J. B. Howard, J. Chem. Phys. 5, 442, 451 (1937) E. B. Wilson, Jr., 6, 740 (1938) F. Stitt, 7, 297 (1939)
  2. A. Borden and E. F. Barker, J. Chem. Phys. 6, 553 (1939) J. R. Lawson, Thesis J. R. Lawson and H. M. Randall (to appear shortly)
  3. D. M. Dennison and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Phys. Rev. 41, 313 (1932)
  4. H. H. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. 40, 445 (1932)
  5. E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, Modern Analysis, fourth edition, p. 412
  6. M. J. O. Strutt, Ergebn. Der. Math. u. Ihrer Grenz. I, No. 3, p. 14 (1932)
  7. D. M. Dennison, Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 280 (1931)
  8. E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, Modern Analysis, fourth edition, p. 415
  9. E. G. C. Poole, Introduction to the Theory of Linear Differential Equations, p. 182

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation