All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Photoelectric Yields in the Extreme Ultraviolet

Carl Kenty

  • General Electric Vapor Lamp Company, Hoboken, New Jersey

Phys. Rev. 44, 891 – Published 1 December, 1933

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.44.891

Abstract

The photoelectric yields for various surfaces (Ni, W, Mg, W-O and Constantan) illuminated by the extremely short wave-length radiation given out by the positive columns in He, Ne and A respectively, have been determined. The effect of the extremely short wave-length radiation was separated from that of the complete radiation by the use of a quartz disk which, when inserted, cut off all radiations, below 1500A. The yields obtained (in electrons per 100 quanta) range from 11 in the case of Constantan and He, to 0.14 in the case of Mg (surprisingly) and Ne. The yields, e.g., for well degassed Ni for He, Ne and A, were 4.4, 1.6 and 0.6 respectively; those for the other surfaces except Mg varied with the gas in the same general way. Thus the maximum in the yield for most ordinary metal surfaces probably lies on the short λ side of 584A. W-O gave greater yields than W (except in A) and in general undegassed metals gave yields several times greater than well degassed ones. The size of the yields suggests that the photoelectric emission from probe and cathode surfaces in the rare gases may be considerable importance.

References (30)

  1. Carl Kenty, Phys. Rev. 38, 2079L (1931)
  2. W. W. Coblentz and W. B. Emerson, Bull. Bur. Stand. 12, 503 (1915-16)
  3. Dorgello and Abbink, Physica 6, 150 (1926) ibid.7, 1 (1927)
  4. Omitted endnote

  5. M. G. Evans, Proc. Roy. Soc. A134, 97 (1931)
  6. Carl Kenty, Phys. Rev. 43, 181 (1933) 38, 377L (1931)
  7. Simon Sonkin, Phys. Rev. 43, 788 (1933)
  8. F. M. Penning, Zeits. f. Physik 78, 454 (1932) O. S. Duffendack and R. W. Smith, Phys. Rev. 43, 586L (1933)
  9. Reichrudel and Spiwak (Ann. d. Physik 17, 65 (1933), [21,22] Phys. Rev. 42, 580 (1933))
  10. C. G. Found and I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 39, 237 (1932)
  11. W. Schottky, Phys. Zeits. 25, 635 (1924)
  12. Omitted endnote

  13. Omitted endnote

  14. I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 38, 1656 (1931)
  15. Carl Kenty, Phys. Rev. 43, 776A (1933)
  16. [6] ([6]) [6]
  17. W. See I. Langmuir and D. S. Villars, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53, 486 (1931)
  18. Déjardin and Schwégler, Comptes Rendus 196, 1585 (1933) Cashman and Huxford, Phys. Rev. 43, 811 (1933)
  19. R. C. Williamson, Phys. Rev. 21, 107 (1923) Hughes and DuBridge, Photoelectric Phenomena, p. 48
  20. Hughes and DuBridge, Photoelectric Phenomena, p. 76
  21. P. R. Gleason, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 15, 551 (1929) Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci. 64, 91 (1930)
  22. H. M. O'Bryan, Phys. Rev. 38, 32 (1933)
  23. K. Sommermeyer, Ann. d. Physik 13, 315 (1932) G. Bandopadhyaya, Proc. Roy. Soc. A120, 96 (1928)
  24. Campbell and Ritchie Photoelectric Cells pp. 26, 27 L. B. Linford, Rev. Mod. Phys. 5, 34 (1933)
  25. O. W. Richardson, Proc. Roy. Soc. A119, 531 (1928)
  26. M. L. E. Oliphant, Proc. Roy. Soc. A124, 228 (1929)
  27. K. K. Darrow, Electrical Phenomena in Gases, p. 362
  28. K. K. Darrow, [25], pp. 362-365 E. W. Pike, Phys. Zeits. 33, 457 (1933)
  29. Hughes and DuBridge, [19], pp. 170, 171
  30. J. Taylor, Proc. Roy. Soc. A117, 508 (1928)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation