- Access by Xinjiang University
Mass Ratio of the Lithium Isotopes from the Spectrum of
Phys. Rev. 44, 155 – Published 1 August, 1933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.44.155
Abstract
Wave-number data.—The blue-green absorption bands of lithium have been photographed in the second order of a 21-foot grating. In the main, , system the 2,0, 1,0, 0,0, 0,1 and 0,2 bands and in the isotopic, , system the 1,0, 0,0, 0,1 bands and a somewhat incomplete 0,2 band have been measured and analyzed. Wave numbers of the lines of all these bands are tabulated. An unsuccessful attempt was made to identify band lines.
Vibrational constants.—Values of are calculated by least squares and from them are deduced the vibrational constants of the main and isotopic systems. The constants are given by the following equations: , , , . The isotopic mass coefficient was calculated for the lower and upper states. The resulting values are, from the state, (considered the most trustworthy figure) and from the state, . These results are shown to correspond to a higher isotopic mass ratio / than that indicated by the massspectrograph results of Costa. By employing the branch of the 0,2 isotope band, was found and the relation was verified to within the probable error.
Rotational and electronic constants.—From rotational term differences, values of were computed for the main and isotopic systems by least squares. The calculated constants are: , , , . From the relation are obtained values of which agree to within their probable error (one part in 1500) with the more accurate results obtained from the vibrational constants. The -doubling for the two lowest vibrational levels of the state was investigated and found sensibly equal for the main and isotopic band systems. The origins of the two band systems were computed to be and , indicating no measurable electronic isotope effect.
References (28)
- J. D. Cockcroft and E. T. S. Walton, Proc. Roy. Soc. A137, 229 (1932)
- E. O. Lawrence, M. S. Livingston and M. G. White, Phys. Rev. 42, 150 (1932)
- M. C. Henderson, Phys. Rev. 43, 98 (1933)
- M. de Broglie and L. Leprince Ringuet, C. R. 194, 1616 (1932)
- I. Curie, F. Joliot and P. Savel, C. R. 194, 2208 (1932)
- J. Costa, Ann. de Physique 4, 425 (1925)
- F. W. Aston, Proc. Roy. Soc. A115, 487 (1927)
- H. D. Babcock and R. T. Birge, Phys. Rev. 37, 233 (1931)
- F. A. Jenkins and A. McKellar, Phys. Rev. 42, 464 (1932)
- K. Wurm, Zeits. f. Physik 58, 562 (1929)
- A. Harvey and F. A. Jenkins, Phys. Rev. 35, 789 (1930)
- W. R. van Wijk and A. J. van Koeveringe, Proc. Roy. Soc. A132, 98 (1931)
- F. W. Loomis and R. E. Nusbaum, Phys. Rev. 38, 1447 (1931)
- F. W. Loomis and R. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. 32, 223 (1928)
- K. T. Bainbridge, J. Frank. Inst. 212, 317 (1931)
- F. W. Aston, Proc. Roy. Soc. A134, 571 (1932)
- G. Nakamura, Nature 128, 759 (1931)
- R. S. Mulliken, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2, 100 (1930)
- R. T. Birge, Phys. Rev. 40, 207 (1932)
- J. L. Dunham, Phys. Rev. 41, 721 (1932)
- A. McKellar, Phys. Rev. 43, 215 (1933)
- [9], p. 483
- D. S. Hughes and C. Eckart, Phys. Rev. 36, 694 (1930) D. S. Hughes, 38, 857 (1931)
- [11], p. 795
- [1], p. 236
- [7], p. 511
- K. T. Bainbridge, Phys. Rev. 44, 56 (1933)
- J. D. Hardy, E. F. Barker and D. M. Dennison, Phys. Rev. 42, 279 (1932)