- Access by Xinjiang University
A Search for Isotopes of Hydrogen and Helium
Phys. Rev. 41, 32 – Published 1 July, 1932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.41.32
Abstract
The well-known triatomic hydrogen ion of mass 3 is formed by electron impact at a rate proportional to the square of the pressure if the pressure is very low. The isotopic molecular ion , also of mass 3, would be expected to vary linearly with pressure. These two facts constitute a method for distinguishing between the two with a mass spectrograph whose resolving power is insufficient to separate them by magnetic analysis. The method becomes successful only when the working pressures are very low. With a mass spectrograph designed for low pressure work evidence was found which amply confirms the existence of an isotope of hydrogen of mass 2 and also gives a fair estimate of the abundance. In a sample of ordinary commercial electrolytic hydrogen the data indicate an abundance ratio The same ratio for a sample of hydrogen which had been concentrated by Urey, Brickwedde and Murphy came out to be An effort was made to detect a difference in mass between the ions and without success. Considering the resolving power of the apparatus this failure was interpreted as meaning that the packing fraction of is greater than 4× i.e., the atomic weight is greater than 2.008. A search was also made for isotopes 3 and 5 of helium but none were found. It is concluded that their abundance must be less than one part in 50,000.
References (11)
- H. C. Urey, F. G. Brickwedde and G. M. Murphy, Phys. Rev. 40, 1 (1932) 39, 164 (1932) ibid.39, 864 (1932)
- F. Allison, Jour. Ind. Eng. Chem. 4, 9 (1932)
- H. D. Smyth, Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 347 (1931)
- W. Bleakney, Phys. Rev. 40, 496 (1932)
- W. Bleakney, Phys. Rev. 39, 536 (1932) (Letter)
- W. Bleakney, Phys. Rev. 40. 130 (1932) (Abstract)
- H. C. Urey, F. G. Brickwedde and G. M. Murphy, Phys. Rev. 40, 464 (1932)
- H. Kallmann and W. Lasareff, Naturwiss. 20, 206 (1932)
- R. Conrad, Zeits. f. Physik 75, 504 (1932)
- W. Heitler and F. London, Zeits. f. Physik 44, 455 (1927)
Omitted endnote