All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

The Reflecting and Resolving Power of Calcite for X-rays

Samuel K. Allison

  • University of Chicago

Phys. Rev. 41, 1 – Published 1 July, 1932

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.41.1

Abstract

With a precision double spectrometer, the rocking curves from three pairs of calcites in the (1, -1) positive have been observed for seven wave-lengths from 0.21A, (W Kα1) to 2.3A, (Cr Kα1). Three quantities were observed at each wave-length, (1) the percent reflection (P0), defined as the ratio of the maximum ionization current obtainable from crystal B to the ionization current produced by the x-rays incident on B from A, (2) the coefficient of reflection (R), defined as the ratio of the area of the rocking curve from B to the intensity incident on B from A, (3) the half width at half maximum of the rocking curve from B. One of the pairs (crystals III) was obviously more perfect than the others, and its values of P0, R, and w are compared with theory. It is shown that none of the three quantities defined above is simply related to the analogous observations on a single crystal with monochromatic, parallel, incident x-rays, but that numerical predictions of the values of the above quantities may be obtained from somewhat laborious calculations based on Darwin's theory of diffraction by a perfect crystal as modified by Prins to take account of absorption. It is found that the predicted and observed coefficients of reflection are in good agreement in the wave-length range between 0.5 and 2.3A. On the basis of this agreement it is possible to state that calcite surfaces may be obtained for which there is no evidence of mosaic structure from measurements of the coefficient of reflection by double spectrometer methods in the wave-length region between 0.5 and 2.3A.

References (23)

  1. A. H. Compton, Phys. Rev. 10, 95 (1917) Davis and Stempel, 17, 608 (1921) Phil. Mag. 45, 463 (1923) Wagner and Kuhlenkampff, Ann. d. Physik 68, 369 (1922) Allison and Williams, Phys. Rev. 35, 1476 (1930) Davis and Purks, 34, 181 (1929)
  2. Williams and Allison, J.O.S.A. and R.S.I. 18, 473 (1929)
  3. A. H. Compton, Rev. of Sci. Instr. 2, 365 (1931)
  4. Allison, Phys. Rev. 30, 245 (1927)
  5. Allison and Andrew, Phys. Rev. 38, 441 (1931)
  6. Spencer, Phys. Rev. 38, 1932 (1931)
  7. Darwin, Phil. Mag. 27, 325 and 675 (1914)
  8. Ewald, Phys. Zeits. 26, 29 (1925)
  9. Prins, Zeits. f. Physik 63, 477 (1930)
  10. Larsson, Diss. Upsala 1929 Reported in Siegbahn, Spektroskopie der Rontgenstrahlen, 2nd Ed., (1931), p. 39
  11. A. H. Compton, X-rays and Electrons, (1926), p. 182
  12. Bragg and West, Zeits. f. Krist. 69, 118 (1928)
  13. Omitted endnote

  14. Omitted endnote

  15. S. K. Allison, Phys. Rev. 38, 203 (1931)
  16. Laue, Zeits. f. Physik 72, 472 (1931)
  17. S. K. Allison, Phys. Rev. 38, 203 (1931) ibid.38208
  18. James and Brindley, Phil. Mag. 12, 81 (1931)
  19. Pauling and Sherman, Zeits. f. Krist. 81, 1 (1932)
  20. Omitted endnote

  21. Recent communications from Professor Davis
  22. A. Hoyt, Paper delivered at the Washington Meeting of the American Physical Society, April, 1932
  23. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. 40, 63 (1932)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation