All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electronic States and Band Spectrum Structure in Diatomic Molecules III. Intensity Relations

Robert S. Mulliken

  • Washington Square College, New York University,

Phys. Rev. 29, 391 – Published 1 March, 1927

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.29.391

Abstract

The correspondence principle predicts definite intensity relations for P, Q and R band lines in molecules having a rotational energy term F(j)=B(j2σ2)+, provided σ is an electronic quantum number correlated with a precession about the internuclear axis (along which the angular momentum σh2π is directed). Hönl and London have used the summation rule method to obtain exact equations for each of three possible cases Δσ=0, ±1; these equations are recast here in more convenient form. According to recent work of Dennison, these equations very probably remain valid in the new quantum mechanics. Theoretical curves for the cases Δσ=+1 and 1 are given.

Various electronic emission bands have been interpreted by the writer as corresponding to electronic transitions S1S1(CuH type), P1S1(AlH, He2 "series" bands), D1P1 (He2 λ5733), S1P1(He2 λ4546, λ6400, and CO Ångstrom bands), with σ=0 for S1, σ=1 for P1, and σ=2 for D1 states. Comparison of the predictions of the above theory with the available intensity data on the bands mentioned, assuming in each case thermal equilibrium at a suitable (arbitrarily chosen) temperature, gives in every case qualitative agreement with the predicted distribution for that particular case; usually the agreement appears to be complete within the often comparatively large uncertainties of the data. Oscillation-rotation absorption bands corresponding to σ=σ=0 fall under the theory as a special case, and the data on these bands (in particular the quantitative data of Kemble and Bourgin on HCl) agree with the theory. Intensity relations in S2S2 (violet CN type) and P2S2 (ZnH type) transitions are briefly discussed; the intensity relations resemble those for S1S1 and P1S1 transitions, but no satisfactory theory is as yet available.

The close agreement between theory and experiment for spectra interpreted as due to transitions involving S1, P1, or D1 states seems to make conclusive the already strong evidence for these interpretations. Furthermore (in connection with the observed selection Δσ=0, ±1) it shows that S1, P1, and D1 molecular states all belong to a class in which σ is an electronic quantum number correlated with a precession about the internuclear axis.

In S1P1, P1S1, and D1P1 transitions, there exist in practice (cf. II of this series) two rotational states (A and B) for each value of j. The agreements noted were obtained by disregarding the subdivision into A and B substates; the fact that agreement was obtained in this way shows incidentally that the a priori probabilities of A and B sub-states must be equal.

Another phenomenon not contemplated by the theory, but present in all the He2 bands, is that alternate lines are missing in each branch. The cause of this is obscure, but the evidence for its existence is conclusive and so justifies the procedure, which is necessary to obtain the agreement described above between theory and experiment, of inserting in Eqs. (5)-(6) a factor zero for alternate lines in each branch.

References (40)

  1. A. Kratzer, Naturwiss. 27, 577 (1923) Ann. d. Physik 71, 72 (1923)
  2. E. C. Kemble, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 10, 274 (1924) Phys. Rev. 25, 1 (1925)
  3. E. C. Kemble, Zeits. f. Physik 35, 286 (1925)
  4. R. S. Mulliken, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 12, 144 (1926)
  5. R. S. Mulliken, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 12, 151 (1926)
  6. R. S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev. 28, 481 (1926)
  7. R. S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev. 28, 1202 (1926)
  8. A. Sommerfeld, Atombau und Spektrallinien, 4th Edition, Chapter 9, (1924)
  9. H. Hönl and F. London, Zeits. f. Physik 33, 803 (1925)
  10. G H. Dieke, Zeits. f. Physik 33, 161 (1925)
  11. L. Mensing, Zeits. f. Physik 36, 814 (1926)
  12. E. Fues, Ann. der Physik 80, 367 (1926)
  13. J. R. Oppenheimer, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23, Part 3, p. 327 (1926)
  14. Kemble, Fowler, and Dieke, [7], p. 1206
  15. Omitted endnote

  16. R. Frerichs, Zeits. f. Physik 20, 170 (1923)
  17. Omitted endnote

  18. F. Hund, Zeits. f. Physik 36, 657 (1926)
  19. Omitted endnote

  20. Hönl and London. [9]
  21. Omitted endnote

  22. Omitted endnote

  23. D. M. Dennison, Phys. Rev. 28, 329 (1926)
  24. R. H. Fowler, Phil. Mag. 50, 1079 (1925)
  25. R. S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev. 26, 21-2 and 333 (1925)
  26. R. T. Birge, Astrophys. J. 55, 273 (1922)
  27. J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 28, 980 (1926)
  28. Omitted endnote

  29. R. S. Mulliken, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 12, 158 (1926)
  30. Omitted endnote

  31. Curtis and Long's (Proc. Roy. Soc. 108A, 513, 1925)
  32. W. E. Curtis, Proc. Roy. Soc. 103A, 315 (1923)
  33. G. Eriksson and E. Hulthén, Zeits. f. Physik 34, 775 (1925). p. 777
  34. W. Mörikofer, Dissertation Basel, 1925
  35. Omitted endnote

  36. W. E. Curtis, Proc. Roy. Soc. 101A, 38 (1922)
  37. Omitted endnote

  38. J. C. McLennan, H. G. Smith, and C. A. Lea, Proc. Roy. Soc. 113A, 183 (1926)
  39. Omitted endnote

  40. Omitted endnote

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation