All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Experiments on the Relative Intensities of some X-ray Lines in the L Spectrum of Tungsten and the K Spectrum of Copper

Samuel K. Allison* and Alice H. Armstrong

  • Cruft High Tension Electrical Laboratory, Harvard University

  • *National Research Fellow.

Phys. Rev. 26, 714 – Published 1 December, 1925

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.26.714

Abstract

Tungsten L series lines.—The experiments of Duane and Patterson on the strong lines in the L series of tungsten were repeated with improved apparatus, and also some of the weaker lines were studied. The value 10 obtained by Duane and Patterson for the relative intensity of Lα1 to Lα2 was confirmed. The theoretical ratio is 9. For the β group the relative intensities were found to be, β1:β2:β3:β4:β5:β6:β7:β9:β10=100 :49.3 :15.0 :7.7 :.47 :2.0 :.4 :.68 :.60 . The relative intensities of the weak lines among themselves are not very reliable on account of the faintness of the lines and the critical absorption of the target, yet it is clear that the forbidden lines β9, β10 are of the same order of intensity as β5, β7. For the γ group the relative intensities were found to be, γ1:γ2:γ3:γ4:γ5:γ6:γ8=100 :14.0 :22.3 :7.0 :3.0 :2.3 :1(?) . γ8 could not always be obtained. The determination of the intensity ratios for α1, β1 and β2, γ1 was complicated by absorption in the target. The agreement of the observed value of the intensity ratio for β3β4 with the theoretical value 2, tends to confirm Stoner's suggestion that there are twice as many electrons in the M22 orbit as in the M21. The deviation of the observed intensity ratio for γ3γ2 from 2 may be due to the influence of intervening levels.

Copper K series lines.—The average of two determinations of the relative intensity of β to γ gave 100/2.4. No reliable evidence of the non-diagram lines Kα3α4 was obtained at 30,700 volts.

References (17)

  1. Duane and Stenström, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 6, 477 (1920)
  2. Duane and Patterson, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 6, 518 (1920) ibid. 8, 85 (1922)
  3. Duane and Hu, Phys. Rev. 14, 369 (1919)
  4. Burger and Dorgelo, Zeits. f. Physik 23, 258 (1924) Ornstein and Burger, 24, 41 (1924)
  5. A. Sommerfeld, Ann. der Physik 76, 284 (1925)
  6. Coster and Goudsmit, Naturwissenschaften 1, 11 (1925)
  7. Siegbahn and Žáček, Ann. der Physik 71, 187 (1923)
  8. Allison and Armstrong, Phys. Rev. 25, 882 (1925)
  9. Armstrong and Stifler, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. and Rev. Sci. Inst. 11, 509 (1925)
  10. Blake and Duane, Phys. Rev. 10, 624 (1917) J. C. Hudson, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. and Rev. Sci. Inst. 9, 259 (1924)
  11. Omitted endnote

  12. E. Dershem, Phys. Rev. 11, 461 (1918) O. B. Overn, 14, 137 (1919) M. Siegbahn, Phil. Mag. 38, 639 (1919) D. Coster, 44, 546 (1922) C. B. Crofutt, Phys. Rev. 24, 9 (1924)
  13. E. C. Unnewehr, Phys. Rev. 22, 529 (1923)
  14. Davis and Stempel, Phys. Rev. 17, 608 (1921)
  15. E. C. Stoner, Phil. Mag. 48, 719 (1924)
  16. Siegbahn, Spektroskopie der Röntgenstrahlen, p. 102
  17. G. Wentzel, Ann. der Physik 66, 437 (1921)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation