All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of Tension Upon Magnetization and Magnetic Hysteresis in Permalloy

O. E. Buckley and L. W. McKeehan

  • Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, New York, N. Y.

Phys. Rev. 26, 261 – Published 1 August, 1925

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.26.261

Abstract

Magnetic properties of permalloy.—Effect of tension on magnetization and hysteresis. Wires of 5 nickel-iron alloys containing 45, 65, 78.5, 81 and 84 percent Ni, 60 cm long and 0.1 cm in diameter, were studied by a ballistic method, for tensions up to 10,000 lb per in.2 and fields up to saturation (10 to 20 gauss). Permalloy with 81 percent Ni is nearly indifferent to tension in its magnetic behavior; permalloy with less nickel is more easily magnetized and has less hysteresis when under tension, while 84 percent permalloy is more difficulty magnetized and has greater hysteresis when under tension. The saturation values are independent of the tension. In 78.5 percent permalloy, under a tension of 3560 lb per in.2, saturation is reached at only 2 gauss (and is practically complete at 0.2 gauss) and the hysteresis loss is only 80 ergs per cm3 per cycle, so small that it may be regarded as due to slight inhomogeneity rather than to any essential features of the magnetization process. Relation to crystal orientation. X-ray examination proves that this abnormally low loss is not due to any peculiar orientation of the crystal axes as the crystals are found to be oriented at random. Magnetostriction behavior can be deduced from these results. Above 81 percent Ni, permalloy contracts like Ni while below 81 percent Ni, permalloy expands like Fe.

Demagnetising factor for a wire with a length 600 times the diameter, was determined experimentally and found to vary from a maximum of 1.6×104 to a low value, the changes being like these previously described by Benedicks for iron.

References (10)

  1. H. D. Arnold and G. W. Elmen, J. Frank. Inst. 195, 621-632 (1923)
  2. P. P. Cioffi, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. R. S. I., 9, 53-60 (1924)
  3. L. W. McKeehan and P. P. Cioffi, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. R. S. I. 9, 479-485 (1924)
  4. C. Benedicks, Ann. der Phys. (4), 6, 726-740 (1901) G. L. B. Schuddemagen, Phys. Rev. 31, 165-169 (1910) J. Würschmidt, Zeits. f. Phys. 19, 388-397 (1923)
  5. J. Kunz, Bull. Nat. Res. Council, 3, [3], 165-213 (1922)
  6. M. Ettisch, M. Polanyi and K. Weissenberg, Zeits. f. phys. Chem. 99, 332-338 (1921)
  7. W. P. Davey, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. R. S. I. 5, 479-493 (1921)
  8. R. M. Bozorth, Phys. Rev. (2) 23, 764 (1924)
  9. K. Honda and K. Kido, Tohoku Univ. Sci. Rep. 9, 221-232 (1920)
  10. L. W. McKeehan, following paper in this issue

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation