All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Collision Spectroscopy. II. Inelastic Scattering of He+ by Ne

Dewitt Coffey, Jr.*, D. C. Lorents, and F. T. Smith

  • Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California 94025

  • *Atholl McBean Postdoctoral Fellow, 1966-67. Present address: Department of Chemistry, San Diego State College, San Diego, Calif.

Phys. Rev. 187, 201 – Published 5 November, 1969Erratum Phys. Rev. A 2, 549 (1970)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.201

Abstract

The inelastic scattering of He+ by Ne has been studied as a function of angle θ and energy loss ΔE over the range of barycentric energies E from 22 to 500 eV. Many levels of Ne are excited, including autoionizing ones, and excited He+ is also seen. Excitation of the 2p53s configuration of Ne at about 16.8 eV could be resolved uniquely, and was studied in detail. The process does not occur in forward scattering, but only outsides a threshold obeying the rule τc=(Eθ)c1035 eV deg, typical of a curve-crossing interaction. It shows pronounced Stueckelberg interference oscillations, arising from the existence of two semiclassical trajectories inside the crossing point at rc, with the property that the product of the wave number k and the angular spacing Δθ between peaks is substantially constant, i.e., Δb=2πkΔθ=0.44 a. u. These and other properties suffice to show that the upper state is attractive and to identify the transition with the outermost crossing that perturbs the elastic scattering of He+ by Ne, which was earlier shown to be located at rc1.9 a.u. and at an energy of Vc13.5 eV. The behavior of the reduced cross section ρ=θsinθσ(θ, E) at the first Stueckelberg peak shows that the transition probability peaks at an energy of about 25 eV, i.e., when the velocity at the crossing point is about 2.6 × 106 cm/sec. From this, the transition matrix element at the crossing is deduced by Landau-Zener theory to be roughly H12(rc)1 eV. At higher energies the maximum height of the first Stueckelberg peak shows a general falloff as ρ0E=3.2×1016 cm2 eV, as well as a slow oscillation whose peaks are evenly spaced in reciprocal velocity with a characteristic spacing constant v*=8.8×106 cm/sec. This slow oscillation is also seen as an amplitude modulation of the whole pattern of Stueckelberg oscillations, and we tentatively ascribe it to a second mode of dissociation of the excited state produced in the crossing, yielding Ne+ and He(1s2s), which are not detected in our experiments; the probability of producing one or the other set of products presumably depends on the time spent in passing through an interaction region, and thus on the velocity. Above 250 eV another excitation process appears with a threshold at τx5000 eV deg, arising from a crossing at rx1.23 a.u. with a second state dissociating to the same products. Its transition matrix element is shown to be roughly H13(rx)3 eV. Approximate potential curves are deduced for three of the low-lying Σ2 states of HeNe+ and compared with calculations by Michels. It is shown that the available crossing may explain the measured total charge-transfer cross sections measured by Stedeford and Hasted at energies below 1 or 2 keV, but not the magnitudes near the maximum near 10 keV.

Erratum

Collision Spectroscopy. II. Inelastic Scattering of He+ by Ne

Dewitt Coffey, Jr., D. C. Lorents, and F. T. Smith
Phys. Rev. A 2, 549 (1970)

See Also

Collision Spectroscopy. I. Analysis of the Scattering of He+ by Ne and Ar

F. T. Smith, R. P. Marchi, W. Aberth, D. C. Lorents, and O. Heinz
Phys. Rev. 161, 31 (1967)

References (36)

  1. G. Lockwood, H. Helbig, and E. Everhart, Phys. Rev. 132, 2078 (1963) E. Everhart, ibid. 132, 2083 (1963) P. R. Jones, T. L. Batra, and H. A. Ranga, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 281 (1966)
  2. D. C. Lorents and W. Aberth, Phys. Rev. 139, A1017 (1965)
  3. W. Aberth and D. C. Lorents, Phys. Rev. 144, 109 (1966)
  4. J. Perel and A. Y. Yahiku, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, edited by I. P. Flaks (Publishing House Nauka, Leningrad, USSR (1967), p. 400 J. Perel, R. H. Vernon, and H. L. Daley, Phys. Rev. 138, A937 (1965)
  5. F. T. Smith, D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and R. P. Marchi, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 742 (1965)
  6. W. Aberth, D. C. Lorents, R. P. Marchi, and F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 776 (1965)
  7. R. P. Marchi and F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 139, A1025 (1966)
  8. F. T. Smith, R. P. Marchi, D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and O. Heinz, Phys. Rev. 161, 31 (1967)
  9. E. N. Fuls, P. R. Jones, F. P. Ziemba, and E. Everhart, Phys. Rev. 107, 704 (1957)
  10. D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and V. W. Hesterman, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 849 (1966)
  11. C. E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels, Natl. Bur. Std. (U. S.) Circ. No. 467, (Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1949)
  12. J. D. Morrison, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 200 (1963)
  13. G. E. Ioup and B. S. Thomas, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3959 (1967)
  14. D. Jaecks, F. J. DeHeer, and A. Salop, Physica 36, 606 (1967)
  15. J. A. Simpson, S. R. Mielczarek, and J. Cooper, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 269 (1964) K. Codling, R. P. Madden and D. L. Ederer, Phys. Rev. 155, 26 (1967) A. K. Edwards and M. E. Rudd, ibid. 170, 140 (1968)
  16. E. W. Rothe and R. B. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1619 (1959)
  17. A. Dalgarno and A. E. Kingston, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A259, 424 (1960)
  18. H. H. Michels (private communication)
  19. W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. 131, 229 (1963) ibid.139, A27 (1965)
  20. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta, 5, 369 (1932)
  21. M. Matsuzawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 25, 1153 (1968)
  22. F. T. Smith, in Atomic Collision Processes, Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol. XI-C, edited by S. Geltman, K. T. Mahanthappa, and W. E. Brittin (Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., New York, 1969). Vol. XIC, p. 95
  23. R. E. Olson and F. T. Smith (to be published)
  24. K. W. Ford and J. A. Wheeler, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 7, 259 (1959)
  25. F. T. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 2419 (1965)
  26. W. R. Thorson and S. A. Boorstein, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, Quebec, 1965, edited by L. Kerwin and W. Fite (Science Bookcrafters, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, 1965), p. 218
  27. C. Lehman and G. Leibfried, Z. Physik 172, 465 (1962)
  28. F. T. Smith, R. P. Marchi, and K. G. Dedrick, Phys. Rev. 150, 79 (1966)
  29. H. H. Fleischmann and R. A. Young, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 941 (1967)
  30. F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 179, 111 (1969)
  31. A. C. Hurley and V. W. Maslen, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 1919 (1961)
  32. H. J. Oskam, Philips Res. Rept. 13, 335 (1958) Physica 25, 1092 (1958) G. F. Sauter, R. A. Gerber, and H. J. Oskam, ibid. 32, 1921 (1966) G. E. Veatch and H. J. Oskam, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 14, 257 (1969)
  33. F. C. Fehsenfeld, A. L. Schmeltekopf, P. D. Goldan, H. I. Schiff, and E. E. Ferguson, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 4087 (1966)
  34. J. B. H. Stedeford and J. B. Hasted, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A227, 466 (1955)
  35. D. W. Koopman, Phys. Rev. 154, 79 (1967)
  36. D. R. Bates and R. McCarroll, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A245, 175 (1958)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation