- Access by Xinjiang University
Collision Spectroscopy. II. Inelastic Scattering of by Ne
Phys. Rev. 187, 201 – Published 5 November, 1969Erratum Phys. Rev. A 2, 549 (1970)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.187.201
Abstract
The inelastic scattering of by Ne has been studied as a function of angle and energy loss over the range of barycentric energies from 22 to 500 eV. Many levels of Ne are excited, including autoionizing ones, and excited is also seen. Excitation of the configuration of Ne at about 16.8 eV could be resolved uniquely, and was studied in detail. The process does not occur in forward scattering, but only outsides a threshold obeying the rule eV deg, typical of a curve-crossing interaction. It shows pronounced Stueckelberg interference oscillations, arising from the existence of two semiclassical trajectories inside the crossing point at , with the property that the product of the wave number and the angular spacing between peaks is substantially constant, i.e., a. u. These and other properties suffice to show that the upper state is attractive and to identify the transition with the outermost crossing that perturbs the elastic scattering of by Ne, which was earlier shown to be located at a.u. and at an energy of eV. The behavior of the reduced cross section at the first Stueckelberg peak shows that the transition probability peaks at an energy of about 25 eV, i.e., when the velocity at the crossing point is about 2.6 × cm/sec. From this, the transition matrix element at the crossing is deduced by Landau-Zener theory to be roughly eV. At higher energies the maximum height of the first Stueckelberg peak shows a general falloff as eV, as well as a slow oscillation whose peaks are evenly spaced in reciprocal velocity with a characteristic spacing constant cm/sec. This slow oscillation is also seen as an amplitude modulation of the whole pattern of Stueckelberg oscillations, and we tentatively ascribe it to a second mode of dissociation of the excited state produced in the crossing, yielding and , which are not detected in our experiments; the probability of producing one or the other set of products presumably depends on the time spent in passing through an interaction region, and thus on the velocity. Above 250 eV another excitation process appears with a threshold at eV deg, arising from a crossing at a.u. with a second state dissociating to the same products. Its transition matrix element is shown to be roughly eV. Approximate potential curves are deduced for three of the low-lying states of He and compared with calculations by Michels. It is shown that the available crossing may explain the measured total charge-transfer cross sections measured by Stedeford and Hasted at energies below 1 or 2 keV, but not the magnitudes near the maximum near 10 keV.
Erratum
Collision Spectroscopy. II. Inelastic Scattering of by Ne
See Also
Collision Spectroscopy. I. Analysis of the Scattering of by Ne and Ar
References (36)
- G. Lockwood, H. Helbig, and E. Everhart, Phys. Rev. 132, 2078 (1963) E. Everhart, ibid. 132, 2083 (1963) P. R. Jones, T. L. Batra, and H. A. Ranga, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 281 (1966)
- D. C. Lorents and W. Aberth, Phys. Rev. 139, A1017 (1965)
- W. Aberth and D. C. Lorents, Phys. Rev. 144, 109 (1966)
- J. Perel and A. Y. Yahiku, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, edited by I. P. Flaks (Publishing House Nauka, Leningrad, USSR (1967), p. 400 J. Perel, R. H. Vernon, and H. L. Daley, Phys. Rev. 138, A937 (1965)
- F. T. Smith, D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and R. P. Marchi, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 742 (1965)
- W. Aberth, D. C. Lorents, R. P. Marchi, and F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 776 (1965)
- R. P. Marchi and F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 139, A1025 (1966)
- F. T. Smith, R. P. Marchi, D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and O. Heinz, Phys. Rev. 161, 31 (1967)
- E. N. Fuls, P. R. Jones, F. P. Ziemba, and E. Everhart, Phys. Rev. 107, 704 (1957)
- D. C. Lorents, W. Aberth, and V. W. Hesterman, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 849 (1966)
- C. E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels, Natl. Bur. Std. (U. S.) Circ. No. 467, (Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1949)
- J. D. Morrison, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 200 (1963)
- G. E. Ioup and B. S. Thomas, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3959 (1967)
- D. Jaecks, F. J. DeHeer, and A. Salop, Physica 36, 606 (1967)
- J. A. Simpson, S. R. Mielczarek, and J. Cooper, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 269 (1964) K. Codling, R. P. Madden and D. L. Ederer, Phys. Rev. 155, 26 (1967) A. K. Edwards and M. E. Rudd, ibid. 170, 140 (1968)
- E. W. Rothe and R. B. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1619 (1959)
- A. Dalgarno and A. E. Kingston, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A259, 424 (1960)
- H. H. Michels (private communication)
- W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. 131, 229 (1963) ibid.139, A27 (1965)
- E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta, 5, 369 (1932)
- M. Matsuzawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 25, 1153 (1968)
- F. T. Smith, in Atomic Collision Processes, Lectures in Theoretical Physics, Vol. XI-C, edited by S. Geltman, K. T. Mahanthappa, and W. E. Brittin (Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., New York, 1969). Vol. XIC, p. 95
- R. E. Olson and F. T. Smith (to be published)
- K. W. Ford and J. A. Wheeler, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 7, 259 (1959)
- F. T. Smith, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 2419 (1965)
- W. R. Thorson and S. A. Boorstein, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, Quebec, 1965, edited by L. Kerwin and W. Fite (Science Bookcrafters, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, 1965), p. 218
- C. Lehman and G. Leibfried, Z. Physik 172, 465 (1962)
- F. T. Smith, R. P. Marchi, and K. G. Dedrick, Phys. Rev. 150, 79 (1966)
- H. H. Fleischmann and R. A. Young, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 941 (1967)
- F. T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 179, 111 (1969)
- A. C. Hurley and V. W. Maslen, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 1919 (1961)
- H. J. Oskam, Philips Res. Rept. 13, 335 (1958) Physica 25, 1092 (1958) G. F. Sauter, R. A. Gerber, and H. J. Oskam, ibid. 32, 1921 (1966) G. E. Veatch and H. J. Oskam, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 14, 257 (1969)
- F. C. Fehsenfeld, A. L. Schmeltekopf, P. D. Goldan, H. I. Schiff, and E. E. Ferguson, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 4087 (1966)
- J. B. H. Stedeford and J. B. Hasted, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A227, 466 (1955)
- D. W. Koopman, Phys. Rev. 154, 79 (1967)
- D. R. Bates and R. McCarroll, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A245, 175 (1958)