All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Model-Potential Calculation of the Density of States in Liquid and Solid Lithium, Cadmium, and Indium

ROBERT W. SHAW, Jr.*

NEVILLE V. SMITH

  • Division of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

  • Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

  • *Present address: Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, England.

Phys. Rev. 178, 985 – Published 15 February, 1969

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.178.985

Abstract

A perturbation expansion of the electron energy has been used to calculate the density of states in liquid lithium, cadmium, and indium. The full nonlocal form of the optimum model potential proposed by Shaw has been used in these calculations. It is shown by comparing the nonlocal calculation to various approximate calculations that the nonlocal effects produce large changes in the second-order corrections to the electron energy and a considerable smoothing of the structure in the density of states. The first-order, k-dependent corrections to the electron energy have been included, and k-dependent effective masses have been calculated for several elements. The density of states for crystalline lithium, cadmium, and indium has also been calculated by determining the distortion of energy surfaces due to the first few zone planes. The results for liquid and solid are compared, and agreement with experiment is discussed.

References (29)

  1. P. Phariseau and J. M. Ziman, Phil. Mag. 8, 1487 (1963)
  2. S. F. Edwards, Phil. Mag. 6, 617 (1961) Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A267, 518 (1962)
  3. L. E. Ballentine and V. Heine, Phil. Mag. 9, 617 (1964)
  4. T. E. Faber, Advan. Phys. 15, 547 (1966)
  5. L. E. Ballentine, Can. J. Phys. 44, 2533 (1966)
  6. B. J. Austin, V. Heine, and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 127, 276 (1962)
  7. W. A. Harrison, Pseudo potentials in the Theory of Metals (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966)
  8. R. W. Shaw, Jr., and W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. 163, 604 (1967)
  9. R. W. Shaw, Jr., Phys. Rev. 174, 769 (1968)
  10. R. Koyama, W. E. Spicer, N. W. Ashcroft, and W. E. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1284 (1967)
  11. R. Koyama and W. E. Spicer (unpublished)
  12. E. F. W. Seymour and G. A. Styles, Phys. Letters 10, 269 (1964)
  13. J. M. Ziman, Advan. Phys. 16, 421 (1967)
  14. F. S. Ham, Phys. Rev. 128, 2524 (1962)
  15. W. A. Harrison, Advan. Phys. 16, 383 (1967)
  16. N. W. Ashcroft and J. Lekner, Phys. Rev. 145, 83 (1966)
  17. N. Watabe and M. Tanaka, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 31, 529 (1964)
  18. D. Weaire, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 92, 956 (1967)
  19. H. Ocken and C. H. J. Wagner, Phys. Rev. 149, 149 (1966)
  20. J. L. Tomlinson (private communication)
  21. M. Tanaka and J. L. Beeby, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 1088 (1966)
  22. C. E. W. Hahn and J. E. Enderby, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 92, 418 (1967)
  23. H. W. B. Skinner, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A239, 95 (1946)
  24. J. A. Catterall and J. Trotter, Phil. Mag. 8, 897 (1963)
  25. W. E. Knight, A. G. Berger, and V. Heine, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 8, 173 (1959)
  26. J. E. Adams, L. Berry, and R. R. Hewitt, Phys. Rev. 143, 164 (1966) F. Rossini (private communication) [25]
  27. E. M. Dickson, thesis, University of California, 1968 (unpublished)
  28. C. N. Berglund and W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. 136, A1044 (1964)
  29. W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. 154, 385 (1967)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation