All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurements and Distorted-Wave Born-Approximation Analyses of Some 13.9-MeV Differential Cross Sections for the N14(He3, α)N13 Reactions

B. T. Lucas*, D. R. Ober, and O. E. Johnson

  • Department of Physics, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

  • *Present address: 1713 Myrtle Avenue, Whiting, Ind.

Phys. Rev. 167, 990 – Published 20 March, 1968

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.167.990

Abstract

The (He3, α) differential cross sections leading to the ground and 2.367-, (3.51+3.56)-, 6.38-, and (7.18+7.42)-MeV states of N13 have been measured at an incident He3 energy of 13.9 MeV using silicon surface-barrier detectors and a conventional electronic spectrometer system. Energy spectra were accumulated at 2.5° intervals over a laboratory angular range 17.5°-90° and at 5° intervals from 90° to 170°. The experimental differential (He3, α) cross sections corresponding to states in N13 at 0, 2.367, 6.38, and (7.18+7.42) MeV exhibit a pronounced oscillatory structure, suggesting that a direct-reaction mechanism is dominant. The composite cross section corresponding to the transitions leading to the (3.51+3.56)-MeV doublet has a somewhat washed-out structure. All angular distributions display a definite forward-angle peaking, and those leading to the ground and 2.367- and (3.51+3.56)-MeV states of N13 show evidence of strong backward-angle peaking. The transitions leading to the odd-parity states in N13 appear to be considerably enhanced relative to those leading to the even-parity states. The angular distributions corresponding to the transitions to the ground and 2.367- and 6.38-MeV states have been analyzed within the framework of the zero-range distorted-wave theory using a simple knockout model. The use of cutoff radii equal to or slightly larger than the nuclear radius was necessary in order to obtain reasonably good representations of the experimental data.

References (22)

  1. I. J. Taylor, F. de S. Barros, P. D. Forsyth, A. A. Jaffe, and S. Ramavataram, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A75, 772 (1960)
  2. K. P. Artemov, V. Z. Goldberg, B. I. Islamov, V. P. Rudakov, and I. N. Serikov, Yadern. Fiz. 1, 1019 (1965) [English transl.: Soviet. J. Nucl. Phys. 1, 726 (1965)]
  3. A. R. Knudson and F. C. Young, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 12, 502 (1967)
  4. A. Gallmann, D. E. Alburger, D. H. Wilkinson, and F. Hibou, Phys. Rev. 129, 1765 (1963)
  5. T. E. Young, G. C. Phillips, R. R. Spencer, and D. A. A. S. N. Rao, Phys. Rev. 116, 962 (1959)
  6. T. Lauritsen and F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Energy Levels of Light Nuclei-May 1962 (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington, D. C.)
  7. N. Nikolic, L. J. Lidosfky, and T. H. Kruse, Phys. Rev. 132, 2212 (1963)
  8. F. C. Barker, G. D. Symons, N. W. Tanner, and P. B. Treacy, Nucl. Phys. 45, 449 (1963)
  9. G. G. Shute and A. M. Baxter, Nucl. Phys. 83, 460 (1966)
  10. F. C. Barker, Nucl. Phys. 28, 96 (1961)
  11. D. Kurath, Phys. Rev. 101, 216 (1956)
  12. F. C. Barker, Nucl. Phys. 45, 467 (1963)
  13. S. T. Butler, Phys. Rev. 106, 272 (1957)
  14. E. K. Warburton and J. N. McGruer, Phys. Rev. 105, 639 (1957)
  15. B. T. Lucas, S. W. Cosper, and O. E. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 133, B963 (1964)
  16. Omitted endnote

  17. W. Tobocman, Theory of Direct Nuclear Reactions (Oxford University Press, London, 1961)
  18. W. R. Gibbs, V. A. Madsen, J. A. Miller, W. Tobocman, E. C. Cox, and L. Mowry, Direct Reaction Calculation, NASA TN D-2170 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D. C., 1964)
  19. B. B. Srivastava, S. W. Cosper, and O. E. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 153, 1221 (1967)
  20. Omitted endnote

  21. W. D. Ploughe, Phys. Rev. 122, 1232 (1961)
  22. N. Austern, in Selected Topics in Nuclear Theory (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1963), p. 30

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation