All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Study of Reactions B10(p, d)B9 and B11(p, d)B10

L. A. Kull* and E. Kashy

  • Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

  • *Present address: Gulf General Atomic, San Diego, Calif.

Phys. Rev. 167, 963 – Published 20 March, 1968

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.167.963

Abstract

Excited states of B9 and B10 were studied by means of the (p, d) reaction, using 33.6-MeV incident protons. Deuteron groups were observed corresponding to strongly excited levels in B9 at 0.0-, 2.35-, 7.1-, and 11.75-MeV excitation and in B10 at 0.0-, 0.72-, 1.76-, 2.15-, 3.57-, 4.75-, 5.10-, and 6.04-MeV excitation. Small deuteron yields were observed corresponding to excited states in B9 at 2.8- and 14.6-MeV excitation and B10 at 6.57- and 7.5-MeV excitation. The angular distribution for the elastic scattering of 33.6-MeV protons from B10 was measured and fitted with an optical-model calculation to provide parameters for a distorted-wave Born-approximation (DWBA) analysis of the (p, d) data. Angular distributions were taken for all the levels strongly excited in the (p, d) reaction, and the results compared to a DWBA calculation. Spectroscopic factors were extracted and compared with theoretical intermediate-coupling calculations in the 1p shell and with other (p, d) and (d, t) results. Spin assignments were made for the levels of B9 strongly excited in the (p, d) reaction. Difficulties in matching the shapes of the experimental angular distributions to DWBA calculations for pickup and stripping reactions involving light nuclei are discussed.

References (22)

  1. L. Kull, Phys. Rev. 163, 1066 (1967)
  2. T. Lauritsen and F. Ajzenburg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. 78, 1 (1966)
  3. D. Bachelier et al., J. Phys. (Paris) C1, 51 (1966)
  4. D. Bachelier et al.University of Minnesota Linac Laboratory Progress Report, 1964, p. 61 (unpublished)
  5. D. Kurath (private communication)
  6. V. V. Balashov, A. N. Boyarkina, and I. Rotter, Nucl. Phys. 59, 417 (1964)
  7. G. D. Symons, Phys. Letters 18, 142 (1965)
  8. E. F. Farrow and H. J. Hay, Phys. Letters 11, 50 (1964)
  9. H. Fuchs and R. Santo, Phys. Letters 24B, 234 (1967)
  10. G. Schrank, E. K. Warburton, and W. W. Daehnick, Phys. Rev. 127, 2159 (1962)
  11. D. Hasselgren, P. U. Renberg, O. Sundberg, and G. Tibell, Nucl. Phys. 69, 81 (1965)
  12. E. H. Auerbach, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report No. BNL-6562, 1962 (unpublished)
  13. Omitted endnote

  14. Omitted endnote

  15. D. Dehnhard, G. C. Morrison, and Z. Vager, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1966 (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1967)
  16. R. H. Siemssen, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 12, 479 (1967)
  17. L. L. Lee, J. P. Schiffer, B. Ziedman, G. R. Satchler, R. M. Drisko, and R. H. Bassel, Phys. Rev. 136, B971 (1964)
  18. J. Legg, Phys. Rev. 129, 272 (1962)
  19. E. W. Hamburger and J. R. Cameron, Phys. Rev. 117, 781 (1960)
  20. R. H. Siemssen, G. C. Morrison, B. Zeidman, and H. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 1050 (1966)
  21. G. Reynolds, J. R. Maxwell, and N. M. Hintz, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10, 439 (1965)
  22. N. S. Chant, P. S. Fisher, and D. K. Scott, Nucl. Phys. A99, 669 (1967)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation