- Access by Xinjiang University
Metamagnetism in
Phys. Rev. 167, 449 – Published 10 March, 1968
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.167.449
Abstract
The magnetic properties of the metamagnet are analyzed using molecular-field theory. For the antiferromagnetic ground state, it is assumed that linear, ferromagnetic chains of spins () are polarized along the axis of the orthorhombic unit cell, with neighboring chains antiparallel. The weakly magnetic ions provide an apparently inert magnetic background. Exchange constants are deduced from the paramagnetic Curie temperature K and the critical field kOe. The constants for first- and second-neighbor interactions are K and K, respectively. An anisotropy field of 7 kOe is derived from the transverse magnetic susceptibility at low temperatures. This value is also obtained from a magnetic dipolar sum. Theoretical estimates of the ordering temperature give K, as observed.
References (28)
- L. Holmes and M. Schieber, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 968 (1966)
- M. Schieber, R. G. Gordon, and S. L. Hou, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Magnetism, Nottingham, 1964 (Institute of Physics and the Physical Society, London, 1965), p. 499
- F. Hullinger and O. Vogt, Phys. Letters 21, 138 (1966)
- R. C. Rau, Acta Cryst. 20, 716 (1966)
- A. A. Samokhralov, V. G. Bamburov, N. V. Volkenshteyn, T. D. Zotov, A. A. Ivakin, Yu. N. Morozov, and M. I. Simonova, Fiz. Metal. i Metalloved. (USSR) 20, 308 (1965) [English transl.: Phys. Metals Metallog. 20, 138 (1965)]
- F. F. Y. Wang, Phys. Status Solidi 14, 189 (1966)
- H. Wickman (private communication)
- J. S. Smart, Effective Field Theories of Magnetism (W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa., 1966)
- J. H. Van Vleck, J. Chem. Phys. 5, 320 (1937), especially pp. 326-7
- E. L. Boyd, Phys. Rev. 145, 174 (1966)
- H. Sato, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 54 (1961)
- J. W. Stout and R. C. Chisholm, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 979 (1962)
- L. Holmes, thesis, Harvard University, 1966 (unpublished)
- M. E. Fisher, Am. J. Phys. 32, 343 (1964)
- S. Van Houten, Phys. Letters 2, 215 (1962) U. Enz, J. F. Fast, S. Van Houten, and J. Smit, Phillips Res. Rept. 17, 451 (1962)
- T. R. McGuire, B. E. Argyle, M. W. Shafer, and J. S. Smart, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1345 (1963) ibid.35, 984 (1964)
- F. Holtzberg, T. R. McGuire, and S. Methfessel, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 976 (1966) A. M. De Graaf and R. M. Xavier, Phys. Letters 18, 225 (1965) J. Smit, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1455 (1966)
- L. M. Corliss, J. M. Hastings, and W. Kunnmann, Phys. Rev. 160, 408 (1967)
- S. Geller, R. C. Sherwood, J. P. Remeika, and G. P. Espinosa, Phys. Rev. 131, 1080 (1963)
- R. C. LeCraw, J. P. Remeika, and H. Matthews, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 901 (1965)
- B. T. Matthias, R. M. Bozorth, and J. M. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 160 (1961)
- G. Busch, P. Junod, M. Risi, and O. Vogt, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Semiconductors, Exeter, 1962 (Institute of Physics and Physical Society, London, 1962), p. 727
- G. Busch, P. Junod, R. G. Morris, J. Muheim, and W. Statius, Phys. Letters 11, 9 (1964)
- T. R. McGuire (private communication)
- G. Will, S. J. Pickhart, H. A. Alperin, and R. Nathans, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1679 (1963)
- W. P. Wolf and J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 118, 1490 (1960)
- A. Frank, Phys. Rev. 48, 765 (1935) M. Schieber and L. Holmes, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1159 (1965)
- R. M. Bozorth and J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 118, 1493 (1960)