All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stark Effect in the Excited States of Rb, Cs, Cd, and Hg

Abbas Khadjavi* and Allen Lurio

W. Happer

  • IBM Watson Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, New York

  • Columbia University, New York, New York

  • *Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Pure Science, Columbia University. Present address: Westinghouse Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15235.

Phys. Rev. 167, 128 – Published 5 March, 1968

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.167.128

Abstract

Two new experimental techniques have been developed and used to measure the differential Stark shifts between the Zeeman sublevels in excited atomic states. For states whose differential Stark shifts, in uniform electric fields attainable in the laboratory, are comparable to the hfs separation, the method of pure electricfield level crossing may be used. This method has been applied to the 6pP322 state of rubidium and the 7pP322 state of cesium. The differential shifts are E(±32)E(±12)=0.521±0.021 Mc/(kV/cm)2 in Rb, and 1.077±0.043 Mc/(kV/cm)2 in Cs. For isotopes with no hyperfine structure (I=0) or states whose Stark shifts are small compared to their hfs, we have used the level-crossing technique with parallel electric and magnetic fields. This technique has been employed to measure the differential shifts in the 5s5pP13 state of cadmium and the 6s6pP13 state of mercury. The results are E(±1)E(0)=2.550±0.105 kc/(kV/cm)2 in Cd, and -2.355±0.090 kc/(kV/cm)2 in Hg. The theory of quadratic Stark shifts in terms of scalar and tensor operators is presented, and the shifts in these four elements are calculated using the Coulomb approximation for the potential of the outer electron. The agreement between the experimental and the theoretical values is satisfactory.

References (13)

  1. A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A233, 70 (1956) C. Schwartz, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 2, 156 (1959) R. M. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 127, 1220 (1962)
  2. J. E. Blamont, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 2, 55 (1957) R. D. Haun, Jr., and J. R. Zacharias, Phys. Rev. 107, 107 (1957) E. Lipworth and P. G. H. Sandars, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 716 (1964) R. Marrus, D. McColm, and J. Yellin, Phys. Rev. 147, 55 (1966) E. B. Aleksandrov and V. V. Khromov, Opt. i Spektroskopiya 18, 545 (1964) [English transl.: Opt. Spectry. (USSR) 18, 313 (1965)] B. Budick, S. Marcus, and R. Novick, Phys. Rev. 140, A1041 (1965) J. J. Forney and E. Geneux, Phys. Letters 20, 632 (1966) [8]
  3. P. G. H. Sandars and J. R. P. Angel [J. R. P. Angel, thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, 1967 (unpublished)] W. Happer and E. B. Saloman, Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 441 (1965)
  4. E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1935), Chap. IV
  5. D. R. Bates and A. Damgaard, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 242, 101 (1949)
  6. G. Breit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 5, 91 (1933) P. A. Franken, Phys. Rev. 121, 508 (1961) M. E. Rose and R. L. Carovillano, ibid. 122, 1185 (1961)
  7. U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74 (1957) T. R. Carver and R. B. Partridge, Am. J. Phys. 34, 339 (1966)
  8. A. Khadjavi, W. Happer, and A. Lurio, Phys. Rev. Letters 17, 463 (1966)
  9. W. Hanle, Z. Physik 35, 346 (1926)
  10. J. Barrat, J. Phys. Radium 20, 633 (1959)
  11. T. G. Eck, L. L. Foldy, and H. Wieder, Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 239 (1963) H. Weider and T. G. Eck, Phys. Rev. 153, 103 (1967)
  12. F. W. Byron, Jr., M. N. McDermott, and R. Novick, Phys. Rev. 134, A615 (1964)
  13. R. Marrus, D. McColm, and J. Yellin, Phys. Rev. 147, 55 (1966)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation