All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum Theory of a Simple Maser Oscillator

J. P. Gordon

  • Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey

Phys. Rev. 161, 367 – Published 10 September, 1967

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.161.367

Abstract

We discuss the quantum theory of a simple model of a maser oscillator, consisting of one radiation-field mode interacting with a large number of stationary three-level atoms. The field and the atoms also interact with separate heat reservoirs which represent dissipation mechanisms and an incoherent pumping mechanism. The model is sufficiently simple that some analytical progress can be made with the nonlinear quantal equations before further approximation is necessary. We start from the quantal equation of motion of the field-atom density operator. We make immediate use of a diagonal coherent-state expansion for the field part of the density operator and a somewhat similar expansion for the atom part. This yields an exact equation of the Fokker-Planck form for a c-number weight distribution, which retains all the significance of the original operator equation, and which has the semiclassical equation for the same model as a first, fluctuation-free approximation. We make use of our basic Fokker-Planck equation in a variety of ways. We discuss the reduction of the equation under conditions that the atomic decay constants are large (large atomic linewidth), arriving finally at an equation of motion for a field-only weight function which serves to demonstrate the basic coherence properties of a maser. We derive and discuss the equation of motion of the generalized Wigner density for the maser model. The generalized Wigner density is a smoothed version (a convolution) of our basic weight distribution, and from it we derive an equivalent classical model including noise sources. Finally, we discuss other useful weight distributions and the number representation for the field. The equations we derive in these discussions make contact with the rate equations of Shimoda, Takahasi, and Townes, as well as with the more recent work of Lax and Louisell, Lax, and of Scully and Lamb.

References (16)

  1. M. Lax, Phys. Rev. 145, 110 (1966)
  2. M. Lax and W. H. Louisell, J. Quant. Electron. 3, 37 (1967)
  3. M. Lax, Phys. Rev. 157, 213 (1967) M. LaxBrandeis Summer Institute Lectures, 1966 (Gordon and Breach Scientific Publishers, Inc., New York, to be published)
  4. V. Arzt, H. Haken, H. Riskin, H. Sauermann, Ch. Schmid, and W. Weidlich, Z. Physik 197, 207 (1966)
  5. M. Scully and W. E. Lamb Jr., Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 853 (1966)
  6. R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963) in Quantum Optics and Electronics, Les Houches 1964, edited by C. deWitt, A. Blanden, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Gordon and Breach Scientific Publishers, Inc., New York, 1965)
  7. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 277, (1963)
  8. J. R. Klauder and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Fundamentals of Quantum Optics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, to be published)
  9. J. R. Klauder, J. McKenna, and D. G. Currie, J. Math. Phys. 6, 734 (1965)
  10. K. Shimoda, H. Takahasi, and C. H. Townes, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 12, 686, 1957
  11. Omitted endnote

  12. Omitted endnote

  13. Lax ([3])
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. J. E. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)
  16. W. H. Louisell, Radiation and Noise in Quantum Electronics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1964) [8]

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation