All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electrical-Transport Measurements on Synthetic Semiconducting Diamond

E. C. Lightowlers and A. T. Collins

  • Wheatstone Laboratory, King's College, Strand, London, England

Phys. Rev. 151, 685 – Published 11 November, 1966

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.151.685

Abstract

Four-probe electrical-conductivity measurements have been made on a series of General Electric aluminum-doped and nominally boron-doped synthetic semiconducting diamonds in the temperature range 223 to 323°K, and the results compared with those obtained from a natural semiconducting diamond (type IIb). These results, together with those obtained from optical-absorption, recombination-radiation, and chemical-impurity measurements on the same set of specimens, show that the same acceptor center, namely aluminum, is responsible for the semiconducting properties of both natural diamond and synthetic semiconducting diamond presently available. The large range of activation energies reported by other workers is considered to be due to the onset of impurity conduction at progressively higher temperatures with increasing concentrations of neutral acceptor centers.

References (22)

  1. I. G. Austin and R. Wolfe, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) B69, 329 (1956)
  2. P. T. Wedepohl, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) B70, 177 (1957)
  3. R. T. Bate and R. K. Willardson, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 74, 363 (1959)
  4. P. J. Kemmey and E. W. J. Mitchell, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A263, 420 (1961)
  5. G. R. Leef, D. C. Seeley, and H. G. Nordlin, final report of work performed at the International Telephone and Telegraph Laboratories under U. S. Air Force Contract No. AF19 (628)-225, 1964 (unpublished)
  6. P. J. Dean, E. C. Lightowlers, and D. R. Wight, Phys. Rev. 140, A352 (1965)
  7. S. D. Smith and W. Taylor, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 79, 1142 (1962)
  8. P. J. Dean, Phys. Rev. 139, A588 (1965)
  9. Omitted endnote

  10. D. R. Wight (unpublished)
  11. A. T. Collins, P. J. Dean, E. C. Lightowlers, and W. F. Sherman, Phys. Rev. 140, A1272 (1965)
  12. E. C. Lightowlers, Anal. Chem. 34, 1398 (1962)
  13. R. H. Wentorf and H. P. Bovenkerk, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 1987 (1962)
  14. W. B. Wilson, Phys. Rev. 127, 1549 (1962)
  15. N. F. Mott and W. D. Twose, Phil. Mag. Suppl. 10, 107 (1961)
  16. Omitted endnote

  17. E. H. Putley, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 72, 917 (1958)
  18. P. P. Debye and E. M. Conwell, Phys. Rev. 93, 693 (1954)
  19. H. Fritzsche and K. Lark-Horovitz, Phys. Rev. 113, 999 (1959)
  20. E. A. Davis and W. Dale Compton, Phys. Rev. 140, A2183 (1965)
  21. H. M. Strong (private communication)
  22. V. S. Vavilov, M. I. Guseva, E. A. Konorova, V. V. Krasnopevtsev, V. F. Sergienko, and V. V. Titov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 8, 1964 (1966) [English transl.: Soviet Phys.—Solid State (to be published)]

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation