All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Three-Body Scattering Amplitude. II. Extension to Complex Angular Momentum

Roland L. Omnes and Victor A. Alessandrini*

  • Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • *On leave from Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, as Fellow of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas of Argentina. This institution neither approves nor assumes any liabilities for the information contained in publications by its Fellows.

Phys. Rev. 136, B1137 – Published 23 November, 1964

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1137

Abstract

We have analyzed the problem of extending the three-body scattering amplitude to complex values of the total angular momentum J. We have found four main difficulties: (i) the disconnectedness of the collision matrix; (ii) the complexity of kinematics; (iii) the release of triangular inequalities or of inequalities like |M|<J, which, when J is complex, transforms finite sums into infinite sums which are most often divergent; and (iv) the presence of complex singularities in cosine angle variables in the full amplitude. This last difficulty is not examined in the present paper. We propose a generalization of the Froissart-Gribov formula for the three-body scattering amplitude. In the nonrelativistic problem, the use of the Fadeev equations takes care of difficulty (i), and difficulty (ii) is smoothed by the use of center-of-mass energies of the three particles and the total angular momentum as the only variables. Of the three natural techniques—using the Schrödinger equation, extending the Fadeev equations, and extending the Fredholm solution of the Fadeev equations to complex values of J—only the third one avoids difficulty (iii). We prove that the Fadeev equations cannot be extended because their kernel becomes unbounded and because they do not reduce to the physical equations when J reaches a physical value. However, the Fredholm solution for physical J can be formally extended to complex J, and the extended solution is expressed as the quotient of two Fredholm-type series, where each term of the series is analytic in J in a right half-plane. The Sommerfeld-Watson series never converges for the three-particle scattering amplitude, because of difficulties (iii) and (iv).

See Also

References (49)

  1. T. Regge, Nuovo Cimento 14, 951 (1959) ibid.18, 947 (1960)
  2. G. F. Chew and S. C. Frautschi, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 396 (1961)
  3. S. Frautschi, M. Gell-Mann, and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. 126, 2206 (1962)
  4. K. Bardakci, Phys. Rev. 127, 1832 (1962)
  5. S. Mandelstam, Nuovo Cimento 30, 1113, 1127, and 1148 (1963)
  6. J. Polkinghorne, J. Math. Phys. 4, 503 (1963) ibid.5, 431 (1964)
  7. A. Sommerfeld, Partial Differential Equations in Physics (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1949), p. 282 G. N. Watson, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 95, 83 (1918)
  8. B. M. Udgaonkar and M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 346 (1962)
  9. M. Gell-Mann, in Proceedings of the 1962 Annual International Conference on High-Energy Physics at CERN, edited by J. Prentki (CERN, Geneva, 1962), p. 533
  10. A. Bottino, A. M. Longoni, and T. Regge, Nuovo Cimento 23, 954 (1962)
  11. L. Brown, D. I. Fivel, B. W. Lee, and R. F. Sawyer, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 23, 187 (1963)
  12. H. Ekstein, Phys. Rev. 101, 880 (1956) T. F. Jordan, J. Math. Phys. 3, 429 (1962) A. G. Tixaire, Helv. Phys. Acta 32, 412 (1959) G. Gravert and T. Petzold, Z. Naturforsch. 15a, 311 (1960)
  13. J. Gunson, University of Birmingham, 1962 (unpublished)
  14. R. L. Omnes, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, 1963 (unpublished)
  15. R. G. Newton, Nuovo Cimento 29, 400 (1963) Phys. Letters 4, 11 (1963)
  16. J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. 134, B620 (1964)
  17. L. D. Fadeev, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 39, 1459 (1960) [English transl.: Soviet Phys.—JETP 12, 1014 (1961)] C. Lovelace, in Lectures at the 1963 Edinburgh Summer School, edited by R. G. Moorhouse, (Oliver and Boyd, London, to be published) L. L. Foldy and W. Tobocman, Phys. Rev. 105, 1099 (1957)
  18. K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 105, 1388 (1957)
  19. L. D. Fadeev, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 39, 1459 (1960) [English transl.: Soviet Phys.—JETP 12, 1014 (1961)] L. D. FadeevDokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 138, 565 (1961) ibid.145, 301 (1962) [English transls.: Soviet Phys.—Doklady 6, 384 (1961) Soviet Phys.—Doklady 7, 600 (1962)] L. D. FadeevPublications of the Stoklov Mathematical Institute No. 69 (1963)
  20. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 133, B232 (1964)
  21. R. L. Omnes, Phys. Rev. 134, B1358 (1964)
  22. A. J. Dragt, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, 1964 (to be published)
  23. A. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1957)
  24. G. Szego, Orthogonal Polynomials (American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, New York, 1959)
  25. G. F. Chew, Address to the Washington Meeting of the American Physical Society, April 1964 (to be published) H. P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. 125, 2139 (1962) Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-10843, August 1963 (to be published)
  26. S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 112, 1344 (1958)
  27. M. Froissart, Report to La Jolla Conference on Weak and Strong Interactions, 1961 (unpublished) V. Gribov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 41, 667 (1961) [English transl.: Soviet Phys.—JETP 14, 478 (1962)]
  28. R. Boas, Entire Functions (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1954), p. 153
  29. [23]
  30. [19]
  31. Omitted endnote

  32. M. Hamermesh, Group Theory and its Application to Physical Problems (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1962)
  33. B. A. Lippmann and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 79, 469 (1950)
  34. A. Grossman and T. T. Wu, J. Math. Phys. 2, 710 (1961) A. Grossman, ibid. 2, 714 (1961)
  35. Omitted endnote

  36. Omitted endnote

  37. A. GrossmanBateman Manuscript Project, Higher Transcendental Functions I, edited by A. Erdelyi (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1954), p. 140
  38. [37], p. 141
  39. Morse and Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1953), Vol. II, p. 1024
  40. Morse and Feshbach, [39] [37] [24]
  41. G. Szego, [24] [37]
  42. J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. 134, B162 (1964)
  43. preprint by Andrews and Gunson [M. Andrews and J. Gunson, University of Birmingham, 1964 (to be published)] preprint by M. H. Choudhury of Tait Institute of Mathematical Physics, University of Edinburgh
  44. [37], pp. 76-77
  45. [37], p. 169
  46. C. Lovelace, Phys. Rev. 135, B1225 (1964)
  47. S. Weinberg, M. Scadron, and J. Wright, Phys. Rev. 135, B202 (1964) F. Coester, ibid. 133, B1516 (1964) K. Meetz, J. Math. Phys. 3, 690 (1961)
  48. Bottino, Longoni, and Regge, [10]
  49. [5]

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation