All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Rare-Gas and Hydrogen Molecule Electronic States, Noncrossing Rule, and Recombination of Electrons with Rare-Gas and Hydrogen Ions

Robert S. Mulliken

  • Laboratory of Molecular Structure and Spectra, Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Phys. Rev. 136, A962 – Published 16 November, 1964

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.A962

Abstract

Recent experimental work on helium jets has indicated that excited atoms result usually from collisional-radiative electron capture by atom ions (A++2eA*+e; etc.) rather than by dissociative recombination by molecule ions (A2++eA*+A), while for the heavier rare gases, the latter process is apparently relatively important. It is shown in the present paper that the theoretically expected forms of the potential curves of excited He2 and other rare-gas molecules make dissociative recombination improbable for He2+ but more probable for the other rare-gas diatomic ions. Available spectroscopic data and theoretical considerations make it fairly sure that many of the familiar excited states of He2 have high maxima in their potential curves, but that no pure repulsion curves, except the one for two normal He atoms, exist below the energy of He+ + He. Besides the stable states with stable He2+ core (1σg21σu, Σu2+) plus a Rydberg electron, there must be others with a core (1σg1σu2, Σg2+) which per se is unstable but which on addition of an electron in a sufficiently strongly bound Rydberg orbital is stable; consideration of these states makes possible a reasonable explanation of the Hornbeck-Molnar effect in helium. Statements analogous to those about potential curves and electron recombination in helium are applicable also to a large extent for hydrogen.

References (21)

  1. D. R. Bates, Phys. Rev. 77, 718 (1950)
  2. D. R. Bates, Phys. Rev. 78, 492 (1950)
  3. W. A. Rogers and M. A. Biondi, Phys. Rev. 134, A1215 (1964) T. R. Connor and M. Biondi, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 9, 184 (1964)
  4. D. R. Bates, A. E. Kingston, and R. W. P. McWhirter, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A267, 297 (1962) ibid.A270, 155 (1962) N. D'Angelo, Phys. Rev. 121, 505 (1961) S. Byron, R. C. Stabler, and P. I. Bortz, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 376 (1962)
  5. C. B. Collins and W. W. Robertson, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2202, 2208 (1964) F. E. Niles and W. W. Robertson, ibid. 40, 2909 (1964)
  6. (private communication from Dr. Ferguson)
  7. R. S. Mulliken, Rev. Mod. Phys. 4, 1 (1932), Fig. 49, p. 61
  8. Omitted endnote

  9. ([12]) E. A. Mason and J. T. Vanderslice, J. Chem. Phys. 29, 361 (1958) P. C. Reagan, J. C. Browne, and F. A. Matsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 2650 (1962)
  10. R. S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 3183 (1964) parts I-V ibid.86parts VI and VII to be published later
  11. R. A. Buckingham and A. Dalgarno [Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A213, 327 (1952)] G. H. Brigman, S. J. Brient, and F. A. Matsen [Phys. Rev. 132, 307 (1963)] [J. L. Nickerson, 47, 707 (1935) Y. Tanaka and K. Yoshino, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 3081 (1963)]
  12. Omitted endnote

  13. Omitted endnote

  14. J. C. Browne (private communication)
  15. Omitted endnote

  16. J. A. Hornbeck and J. P. Molnar, Phys. Rev. 84, 621 (1951)
  17. J. S. Dahler, J. L. Franklin, M. S. B. Munson, and F. H. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 3332 (1962)
  18. R. K. Curran, J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2974 (1963)
  19. Omitted endnote

  20. C. B. Collins and M. M. Robertson, J. Chem. Phys. (to be published)
  21. O. Schnepp and K. Dressler, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 49 (1960) ([10])

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation