All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Superconductivity with Pairs in a Relative p Wave

R. Balian

N. R. Werthamer

  • Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette (S.O.), France

  • Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey

Phys. Rev. 131, 1553 – Published 15 August, 1963

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.1553

Abstract

In previous treatments of superconducting systems with attractive interactions acting in odd-angular-momentum partial waves, the correlated electron pairs were formed in only two components of a spin triplet. This oversight is corrected here by a more general variational treatment, allowing all three components. In the case of a p-wave interaction, the present state is proved to give the absolute minimum of the free energy. Its rotational degeneracy is discussed. The energy spectrum is found to be isotropic (provided the normal phase is also) with the usual gap, and so to be completely equivalent thermodynamically to the BCS state. The charge-density autocorrelation is also isotropic, and the charge-current correlation vanishes. The state exhibits the conventional Meissner effect, and cannot be experimentally distinguished from the BCS state by means of electromagnetic or tunneling measurements, acoustic attenuation, or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation times. The paramagnetic spin susceptibility decreases with temperature from its value in the normal phase to a limiting ratio of 23, in good agreement with results deduced from Knight shift measurements on mercury and tin, and in contrast to the BCS prediction. However, the addition of impurities is found to reduce the critical temperature sharply (again in contrast to the BCS case). Thus, the experimental observation of the p-wave pair state is expected to be difficult, and the agreement with Knight shift data is probably fortuitous. Finally, it is suggested that a similar effect in He3 might explain why the predicted superfluid phase has not been observed.

References (33)

  1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957) N. N. Bogoliubov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 34, 58 (1958) [translation: Soviet Phys.—JETP 7, 41 (1958)] J. G. Valatin, Nuovo Cimento 7, 843 (1958)
  2. J. Bardeen and J. R. Schrieffer, in Progress in Low Temperature Physics, edited by C. J. Gorter (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1961), Vol. III
  3. J. Bardeen, IBM J. Research Develop. 6, 3 (1962)
  4. F. Reif, Phys. Rev. 106, 208 (1957)
  5. G. M. Androes and W. D. Knight, Phys. Rev. 121, 779 (1961)
  6. R. J. Noer and W. D. Knight, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 6, 122 (1961)
  7. K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 110, 769 (1958)
  8. V. Heine and A. B. Pippard, Phil. Mag. 3, 1046 (1958) R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. Letters 3, 262 (1959) P. C. Martin and L. P. Kadanoff, ibid. 3, 322 (1959) J. R. Schrieffer, ibid. 3, 323 (1959) P. W. Anderson, ibid. 3, 325 (1959) A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor'kov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 39, 480 (1960) [translation: Soviet Phys.—JETP 12, 337 (1961)] L. N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 367 (1962)
  9. H. Suhl in Low Temperature Physics, edited by C. DeWitt, B. Dreyfus, and P. G. de Gennes (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1962)
  10. D. J. Thouless, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 10, 553 (1960) P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Phys. Rev. 123, 1911 (1961)
  11. K. A. Brueckner, T. Soda, P. W. Anderson, and P. Morel, Phys. Rev. 118, 1442 (1960) V. J. Emery and A. M. Sessler, ibid. 119, 43 (1960)
  12. Omitted endnote

  13. N. N. Bogoliubov, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 119, 244 (1958) [translation: Soviet Phys.—Doklady 3, 292 (1958)] J. G. Valatin, Phys. Rev. 122, 1012 (1961)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. Omitted endnote

  16. C. Bloch and C. De Dominicis, Nucl. Phys. 7, 459 (1958) M. Gaudin, ibid. 15, 89 (1960)
  17. R. Balian and M. L. Mehta, Nucl. Phys. 31, 587 (1962)
  18. N. R. Werthamer, H. Suhl and T. Soda, Eighth International Conference on Low-Temperature Physics, London, 1962 (to be published)
  19. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958)
  20. M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. 1, 404 (1959)
  21. C. Bloch and A. Messiah, Nucl. Phys. 39, 95 (1962) B. Zumino, J. Math. Phys. 3, 1055 (1962)
  22. D. N. Zubarev, Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk 71, 71 (1960) [translation: Soviet Phys.—Uspekhi 3, 320 (1960)]
  23. [19] G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961) V. Ambegaokar and L. P. Kadanoff, Nuovo Cimento 22, 914 (1961)
  24. Omitted endnote

  25. A. M. Clogston, A. C. Gossard, V. Jaccarino, and Y. Yafet, Phys. Rev. Letters 9, 262 (1962)
  26. D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958) A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor'kov, and I. M. Khalatnikov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 35, 265 (1958) ibid.37, 187 (1959) [translations: Soviet Phys.—JETP 8, 182 (1959) Soviet Phys.—JETP 10, 132 (1960)]
  27. T. Tsuneto, Phys. Rev. 121, 402 (1961)
  28. L. C. Hebel and C. P. Slichter, Phys. Rev. 113, 1504 (1959) L. C. Hebel, ibid. 116, 79 (1959)
  29. H. Suhl and B. T. Matthias, Phys. Rev. 114, 977 (1959)
  30. A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor'kov, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 39, 1781 (1960) [translation: Soviet Phys.—JETP 12, 1243 (1961)]
  31. B. T. Matthias, H. Suhl, and E. Corenzwit, Phys. Rev. Letters 1, 92 (1958)
  32. E. A. Lynton, B. Serin, and M. Zucker, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3, 165 (1957)
  33. A. Bardasis and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 121, 1050 (1961)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation