All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

The Joule-Thompson Effect for Air at Moderate Temperatures and Pressures

L. G. Hoxton

  • University of Virginia

Phys. Rev. 13, 438 – Published 1 June, 1919

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.13.438

Abstract

Synopsis.—In the experiments as described air was pumped first through a set of tubes designed to remove carbon dioxide and moisture, then through the throttling device or "porous plug" and finally back to the pump. The plug and tubing immediately leading to it were immersed in an oil bath thermostat. The bath temperatures, for the most part, lay between 0° and 100° C., the mean pressures, from 4.5 to 6.4 meters of mercury, while the pressure-drop varied between 0.25 and 0.80 meters of mercury. The temperature-drop was measured by platinum resistance thermometers differentially connected. The plug was of the radial flow type originated by Regnault, roughly cylindrical in form, through the walls of which the air flowed toward the axis, escaping finally through one end. The accidental errors were apparently of an order under one per cent.

The Joule-Thomson coefficient (μ) was found to have a decreasing linear variation with increasing mean pressures. Its dependence upon both temperature and pressure are embodied in either of two empirical formulas, namely: μ=+0.39350.0069Ip0.001835t+0.00000I34t2+0.0000325pt μ=0.2599+182.0Iτ552.4pτ2 all pressures being measures in meters of mercury, t in degrees C., while τ=273+t.

These formulas are applied to calculate the temperature of the ice point on the thermodynamic scale, to reduce to the same scale the readings of the constant pressure air thermometer and to discuss the variations of cp with pressure. Good agreement with the results of other work is found in the second and third cases, while in the first, the result, in common with that found from other Joule-Thomson data, is higher than the result found from the characteristic gas equations.

The paper includes a brief historical summary of previous experimental work, a discussion of several theoretical points and of sources of error, especially heat leakage.

References (41)

  1. Omitted endnote

  2. Callendar.[29]
  3. Omitted endnote

  4. Davis, H. N., Phys. Rev., 2, 5, 359, 1915
  5. Joule, J. P., and Thomson, Wm., Collected Papers (Thomson), I., p. 333 Scientific Papers (Joule), II., p. 216
  6. Regnault, H. V., Relation des Expériences, III., p. 700
  7. Burnett and Roebuck, Phys. Rev., 30, 529, 1910
  8. Roebuck, J. R., Phys. Rev., 2, 79, 1913
  9. Trueblood, H. M., Proc. Am. Ac. Arts Sci., 52, 733, 1917
  10. Swann, W. F. G., Phil. Trans. (A), 210, 199, 1910
  11. Scheel, K., and Heuse, W., Ann. der Phys. (4), 37, 79, 1912
  12. Hirn, G. A., Theorie Mec. de la Chaleur (3ême ed.), II, p. 387
  13. Griessmann, Zeitsch. ver d. Ing., 47, 1852 and 1880 (1903) Forschungsarb. ver d. Ing., 13, 1, 1904
  14. Grindley, Phil. Trans., 194 A, 1, 1900-1
  15. Peake, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 76, 185, 1905
  16. Dodge, Jour. Am. Sci. Mech. Engs., 28, 1265, 1907 ibid.30, 1227, 1908
  17. Davis, H. N., Proc. Am. Ac. Arts and Sciences, 45, 203, 1910
  18. Cazin, A., Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., (4), 19, 5, 1870
  19. Natanson, E., Wied. Ann., 31, 502, 1887
  20. Witkowski, A. W., Bull. Acad. Sc. Krakau, 282, 1898
  21. Kester, F. E., Phys. Rev., 21, 260, 1905
  22. Olezewski, K., Ann. d. Phys., (4), 7, 818, 1902
  23. Olezewski, K., Phil. Mag. (6), 13, 722, 1907
  24. Rudge, W. A. D., Phil. Mag. (6), 18, 159, 1909
  25. Bradley, W. P., and Hale, C. F., Phys. Rev., 29, 258, 1909
  26. Dalton, J. P., Comm. Phys. Lab. Leiden. 109a and 109c, 1909
  27. Vogel, E., Dissertation, München, 1910 Z. S. f. Kompt. u. fl. Gase, 14, 3, 25, 117, 131, 159, 175, 1911-12
  28. Noell, F., Dissertation, München, 1914
  29. Noell, F., Sitzungsberichte, München M. u. Ph. Kl. 213, 1912 Ann. Beibl., 39, 777, 1915
  30. Buckingham, E., Phil. Mag. (6), 6, 518, 1903
  31. Lehfeldt, R. A., Phil. Mag., 45, 363, 1898
  32. Callendar, H. L., Phil. Mag., (6), 5, 48, 1903
  33. Rose-Innes, J., Phil. Mag. (6), 2, 130, 1901 ibid.6, 353, 1903 ibid.15, 301, 1908
  34. Buckingham, E., Bull. Bureau of Stand., 3, 237, 1907 Phil. Mag., (6), 15, 526, 1908
  35. Berthelot, D., Trav. et Mèm. Bur. Int., 13, 1903 , 13, 1907
  36. Darwin, H., Astrophys. Jl., 20, 347, 1904
  37. Randall, H. M., Phys. Rev., 30, 221, 1910
  38. Carey, Foster, G., Phil. Mag., May, 1884
  39. Callendar, H. L., Phil. Mag., 47, 191, 1899
  40. Chappius, P., Trav. et Mèm. du Bureau Int. des Poids et Mesures, 13, 1907
  41. Holborn and Jacob, Sci. Abstr. No. 866, 1915 Zeit. Vereines Deutsch. Ing., 58, 1429, 1914

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation