All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Depolarization of Negative μ Mesons

R. A. Mann* and M. E. Rose

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

  • *Present address: Department of Physics, University of Alabama, University, Alabama.

Phys. Rev. 121, 293 – Published 1 January, 1961

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.121.293

Abstract

The depolarization of negative μ mesons is discussed in terms of the processes occurring in the formation of μ-mesonic atoms and the subsequent cascade to the ground state. The initial distribution of μ mesons in capturing states of carbon is deduced. The depolarization due to the capture process is derived in a fashion free of essentially all approximations. The only assumption involved is that the scattering cross section is such as to randomize the direction of motion prior to capture and this assumption is shown to be well fulfilled. The effect of radiative transitions in producing depolarization is determined with all possible dipole transitions taken into account. Only nuclei with zero spin are treated in detail. The Auger process is included in a schematic fashion which is sufficient for the purpose in hand. It is shown that both radiative and Auger transitions must be included in the discussion of the depolarization processes in the cascade. The theoretical results are compared with experiment, and from the comparison it is concluded that the observed facts are well accounted for.

References (24)

  1. R. L. Garwin, L. M. Lederman, and M. Weinrich, Phys. Rev. 105, 1415 (1957)
  2. E. J. Konopinski, Annual Review of Nuclear Science (Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1959), Vol. 9, p. 99
  3. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 105, 1671 (1957)
  4. M. E. Rose, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 4, 80 (1959)
  5. I. M. Schmuskevitch, Nuclear Phys. 11, 419 (1959)
  6. K. M. Case, Phys. Rev. 106, 173 (1957)
  7. R. L. Garwin, D. P. Hutchinson, S. Penman, and G. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. 118, 271 (1960)
  8. S. H. P. Jensen and H. Øverås, Kgl. Norske Videnskab. Selskabs, Forh. 31, 34 (1958)
  9. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. 75, 1664 (1949)
  10. B. Mühlschlegel and H. Koppe, Z. Physik 150, 496 (1958)
  11. E. Fermi and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 72, 399 (1947)
  12. V. W. Hughes, D. W. McColm, K. Ziock, and R. Prepost, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 63 (1960)
  13. D. H. Wilkinson, Nuovo cimento 6, 516 (1957)
  14. M. E. Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1957)
  15. G. R. Burbidge and A. H. de Borde, Phys. Rev. 87, 189 (1953) A. H. de Borde, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A67, 57 (1954)
  16. M. Demuer, Nuclear Phys. 1, 516 (1956)
  17. Omitted endnote

  18. Omitted endnote

  19. M. E. Rose, Multipole Fields (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1955), Chap. 6 H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms (Academic Press, New York, 1957), p. 262 R. A. Mann, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-2990 (unpublished)
  20. M. A. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. 118, 1632 (1960) M. B. Stearns and M. Stearns, 105, 1573 (1957)
  21. J. Rainwater, Annual Review of Nuclear Science (Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1957), Vol. 7, p. 1
  22. R. Prepost, V. W. Hughes, S. Penman, D. McColm, and K. Ziock, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 5, 75 (1960)
  23. A. E. Ignatenko, L. B. Egorov, B. Khalupa, and D. Chultem, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. U.S.S.R. 35, 1131 (1959) [translation: Soviet Phys.-JETP 35(8), 792 (1959)]
  24. A. E. IgnatenkoL. B. EgorovB. KhalupaD. Chultemthe 1960 Washington meeting of the American Physical Society

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation