All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Xe129 in Natural Xenon

R. L. Streever* and H. Y. Carr

  • Department of Physics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

  • *Now at the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C.

Phys. Rev. 121, 20 – Published 1 January, 1961

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.121.20

Abstract

The spin-lattice relaxation time T1 of Xe129 has been measured as a function of temperature in the liquid and as a function of pressure in the gas. A strong shift ΔH in the external field required for resonance at constant frequency but varying sample density ρ has been discovered. As the sample density increases in the region above 48 atm, ΔH decreases linearly at the rate of 3.45 milligauss per amagat (density at standard conditions) in a field of 8060 gauss. In the liquid the temperature dependence of the product of T1 and ρ can be described by an activation energy of 0.7±0.1 kcal/mole. In the gas at room temperature between 48 and 73 atm, T1 varies as ρ2.1±0.4. The largest value of T1 observed was 2600±600 sec for a gas sample at 48 atm, and the shortest value was 57±2 sec in the liquid at -101°C. The experimental values of T1 have been compared with theoretical predictions in two limiting cases, the rare gas and the dense liquid. In both cases the experimental values, although larger than previously reported values, are still two to three orders of magnitude smaller than predicted from an intermolecular nuclear magnetic dipole interaction. The relaxation time was found to be independent of field. Implications of our data for determining the relaxation mechanism are discussed. It is suggested that the relaxation may be caused by a fluctuating magnetic field at the nucleus resulting from the motion of nonsymmetrical electronic charge distributions during collisions.

References (16)

  1. N. Bloembergen, Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1948)
  2. N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 73, 679 (1948)
  3. H. C. Torrey, Phys. Rev. 92, 962 (1953)
  4. H. C. Torrey, Suppl. Nuovo cimento 9, 95 (1958)
  5. E. Brun, J. Oeser, H. H. Staub, and C. G. Telschow, Phys. Rev. 93, 904 (1954)
  6. E. Brun, J. Oeser, H. H. Staub, and C. G. Telschow, Helv. Phys. Acta 27, 173 (1954)
  7. F. J. Adrian, thesis submitted to the faculty of Cornell University, 1955 (unpublished)
  8. H. Staub, Helv. Phys. Acta 29, 246 (1956)
  9. H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 94, 630 (1954)
  10. R. L. Streever, thesis submitted to the faculty of Rutgers, The State University, 1959 (unpublished)
  11. H. Y. Carr, Phys. Rev. 112, 1693 (1958)
  12. I. Solomon, Phys. Rev. 92, 962 (1955)
  13. J. Frenkel, Kinetic Theory of Liquids (Dover Publications, New York, 1955)
  14. N. Bloembergen (private communication)
  15. N. Bernardes and H. Primakoff, J. Chem. Phys. 30, 691 (1959)
  16. H. C. Torrey (to be published)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation