All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nuclear Energy Levels in C13, N13, N14, N15, O15, and F18 from He3 Induced Reactions

T. E. Young*, G. C. Phillips, R. R. Spencer, and D. A. A. S. N. Rao

  • The Rice Institute, Houston, Texas

  • *Now at the College of the Pacific, Stockton, California.
  • Now at Phillips Petroleum Company, Atomic Energy Division, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
  • Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas.

Phys. Rev. 116, 962 – Published 15 November, 1959

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.962

Abstract

The Rice Institute 5.5-Mev Van de Graaff accelerator and a magnetic spectrograph have been used to study reaction products produced by He3 bombardment of B11, C12, C13, N14, and O16. Q values of 9.5, 9.3, 6.31, 5.68, 5.63, 5.49, 4.31, 3.67, and 3.29 Mev were observed for the B11(He3, p)C13 reaction, corresponding to excitations of from 3.7 to 9.90 Mev in C13. The energy levels at 7.69 and 8.87 Mev in C13, for which the Q values were 5.49 and 4.31 Mev, were determined to have widths of approximately 75 and 175 kev, respectively. For the C13(He3, p)N15 reaction the observed Q values were 5.38, 4.33, 3.50, 3.36, 3.09, 2.35, 2.09, 1.61 and 1.50 Mev. The O16(He3, p)F18 reaction revealed the existence of twelve states below 3.9 Mev of excitation in F18. These states occur at 0.943, 1.047, 1.089, 1.128, 1.708, 2.102, 2.521, 3.058, 3.130, 3.355, 3.724, and 3.843 Mev of excitation. The ground-state Q values of the O16(He3, α)O15 and N14(He3, d)O15 reactions were determined to be 4.91 and 1.80 Mev, respectively, and the first excited state of O15 was observed at 5.17 Mev by means of the O16(He3, p)O15 reaction.

References (23)

  1. Omitted endnote

  2. Gossett, Phillips, and Eisinger, Phys. Rev. 98, 724 (1955)
  3. A. H. Wapstra, Physica 21, 367 (1955)
  4. Galonsky, Moak, Traughber, and Jones, Phys. Rev. 110, 1360 (1958)
  5. McGruer, Warburton, and Bender, Phys. Rev. 100, 235 (1955)
  6. E. K. Warburton and J. N. McGruer, Phys. Rev. 105, 639 (1957)
  7. R. Budde and P. Huber, Helv. Phys. Acta 28, 49 (1955)
  8. Freir, Tulk, Lampi, and Williams, Phys. Rev. 78, 508 (1950)
  9. A. M. Lane and R. G. Thomas (private communication) [Revs. Modern Phys. (to be published)]
  10. D. Kurath, Phys. Rev. 101, 216 (1956)
  11. Reich, Phillips, and Russell, Phys. Rev. 104, 143 (1956)
  12. F. Ajzenberg and T. Lauritsen, Revs. Modern Phys. 27, 77 (1955)
  13. R. Malm and W. W. Buechner, Phys. Rev. 80, 771 (1950)
  14. E. C. Halbert and J. B. French, Phys. Rev. 105, 1563 (1957)
  15. Kington, Bair, Cohn, and Willard, Phys. Rev. 99, 1393 (1955)
  16. Kistner, Schwarzschild, Rustad, and Alburger, Phys. Rev. 105, 1339 (1957)
  17. E. F. Bennett, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 3, 26 (1958)
  18. Kuehner, Almquist, and Bromley, Bull, Am. Phys. Soc. 3, 27 (1958)
  19. Almquist, Bromley, and Kuehner, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 3, 27 (1958)
  20. R. Middleton and C. T. Tai, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A65, 752 (1951)
  21. Bromley, Kuehner, and Almquist, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 3, 27 (1958)
  22. W. R. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 110, 1408 (1958)
  23. J. P. Elliott and B. H. Flowers, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A229, 536 (1955)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation