All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Conversion Electron Spectrum of Np239 and Level Scheme of Pu239

G. T. Ewan, J. S. Geiger, R. L. Graham, and D. R. MacKenzie*

  • Physics Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada

  • *Present address: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, Long Island, New York.

Phys. Rev. 116, 950 – Published 15 November, 1959

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.950

Abstract

The conversion electron spectrum of Np239 has been studied at resolution settings of 0.1% and 0.05% with a 100-cm radius air-cored π2 β-ray spectrometer, using a proportional counter as detector. One hundred and forty-three lines were identified corresponding to Auger transitions or the internal conversion of γ rays of energies 44.65, 49.41, 57.26, 61.46, 67.86, 88.06, 106.14, 106.47, 181.7, 209.8, 226.4, 228.2, 254.4, 272.9, 277.6, 285.5, 315.9, and 334.3 kev. The results require the addition of a level at 163.75 kev to the basic level scheme for Pu239 proposed by Hollander et al. in order to account for three of the weak gamma transitions observed in this work. The relative conversion line intensities are used to determine the transition multipolarities, mixing ratios and expected quantum intensities assuming the K and L shell theoretical conversion coefficients of Sliv. The precisely determined level spacings and the relative transition probabilities are compared in some detail with those expected from an interpretation of the Pu239 level scheme in terms of the "Unified Model."

New and more accurate K, L, M, and N electron subshell binding energies for Pu have also been deduced from the experimental data of this work. These values are 20 to 100 ev higher than the values tabulated by Hill, Church, and Mihelich, which were estimated by extrapolation from data at lower Z.

References (23)

  1. B. R. Mottelson and S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat.-fys. Skr. 1, No. 8 (1959)
  2. Hollander, Smith, and Mihelich, Phys. Rev. 102, 740 (1956)
  3. Smith, Gibson, and Hollander, Phys. Rev. 105, 1514 (1957)
  4. Asaro, Thomson, and Perlman, Phys. Rev. 92, 694 (1953)
  5. Asaro, Thomson, Stephens, and Perlman, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 2, 393 (1957)
  6. J. M. Hollander, Phys. Rev. 105, 1518 (1957)
  7. Stephens, Asaro, and Perlman, Phys. Rev. 113, 212 (1959)
  8. Ewan, Geiger, Graham, and MacKenzie, Can. J. Phys. 37, 174 (1959)
  9. Graham, Ewan, and Geiger, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 4, 64 (1959)
  10. Wapstra, Nijgh, and van Lieshout, Nuclear Spectroscopy Tables (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1959), p. 127
  11. Omitted endnote

  12. R. O. Lane and D. J. Zaffarano, Iowa State Report I.S.C.-439, 1953 (unpublished)
  13. Hill, Church, and Mihelich, Rev. Sci. Instr. 23, 523 (1952)
  14. L. A. Sliv and I. M. Band, Leningrad Physico-Technical Institute Report, 1956 [translation: Report 57 ICCK1, issued by Physics Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois (unpublished)]
  15. Ewan, Knowles, and MacKenzie, Phys. Rev. 108, 1308 (1957)
  16. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, β- and γ-Ray Spectroscopy, edited by K. Siegbahn (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1955), Chap. XVII
  17. A. K. Kerman, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat-fys. Medd. 30, No. 15 (1956)
  18. I. Perlman and J. O. Rasmussen, Handbuch der Physik (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957), Vol. 42, p. 109
  19. S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat-fys. Medd. 29, No. 16 (1955)
  20. R. L. Graham and R. E. Bell, Phys. Rev. 83A, 222 (1951)
  21. G. Alaga, Phys. Rev. 100, 432 (1955)
  22. D. Engelkemeir and L. B. Magnussen, Phys. Rev. 99, 135 (1955)
  23. S. G. Nilsson and J. O. Rasmussen, University of California Radiation Laboratory Report U.C.R.L.-3889, 1957 (unpublished)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation