All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nuclear Radius and Nuclear Forces

S. D. Drell

  • Department of Physics and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Phys. Rev. 100, 97 – Published 1 October, 1955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.97

Abstract

The difference between the radius of the nuclear matter distribution and the nuclear force radius, RN1.4A13×1013 cm, for heavy nuclei (A>100) is interpreted as a consequence of the finite range of nuclear forces. Assuming that the nuclear matter distribution coincides with the charge distribution as determined at Stanford (RC=1.12A13×1013 cm is the distance at which the charge density falls to one half value) we sum up the nuclear interactions of an incident nucleon for various proposed internucleon potentials, V(r). We also evaluate contributions from the spin, charge, and matter polarizations induced in the nuclear distributions by the incident nucleon as a test of the convergence of these calculations. The aim here is to infer some features of nuclear forces which satisfy saturation requirements and at the same time give rise to an appreciable nuclear attraction for an incident nucleon at RN. Analyses of the scattering of neutrons and protons by heavy nuclei suggest a nuclear attraction ≳14 Mev at a distance RN.

These considerations are primarily sensitive to the long range behavior of the direct, central part of V(r). The key point which emerges from them is that the nuclear forces must contain long range (~ meson Compton wavelength) direct, central attractions which will be felt by an incident nucleon at RN before the shorter range repulsions (hard cores, many-body forces, or exchange interactions), which are responsible for saturation, become effective. Such interactions can be constructed phenomenologically, but are not found in recent meson-theoretically deduced potentials.

References (46)

  1. J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1952), Chap. 1, Sec. 4
  2. Feshbach, Porter, and Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 96, 448 (1954)
  3. FeshbachPorterWeisskopf(personal communication with V. F. Weisskopf) as discussed in the Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL-331 C-21, on the conference "Statistical aspects of the nucleus" held January 24-26, 1955 (especially p. 16)
  4. T. B. Taylor, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell, 1954 (Phys. Rev. to be published) 92, 577 (1954)
  5. R. G. Woods and D. S. Saxon, Phys. Rev. 95, 577 (1954)
  6. Omitted endnote

  7. Omitted endnote

  8. R. G. WoodsD. S. SaxonPersonal communication with Dr. D. S. Saxon and Dr. S. Moszkowski Woods and Saxon in [5] Brookhaven report ([3])
  9. J. S. Blair, Phys. Rev. 95, 1218 (1954) [G. W. Farwell and H. E. Wegner, 95, 1212 (1954)] [3], pp. 51-52 Wall, Rees, and Ford, Phys. Rev. 97, 726 (1955)
  10. Hofstadter, Fechter, and McIntyre, Phys. Rev. 92, 978 (1953) Hofstadter, Hahn, Knudsen, and McIntyre, 95, 512 (1954) Yennie, Wilson, and Ravenhall, 92, 1325 (1953) Yennie, Ravenhall, and Wilson, 95, 500 (1954)
  11. Pidd, Hammer, and Raka, Phys. Rev. 92, 436 (1953)
  12. V. L. Fitch and J. Rainwater, Phys. Rev. 92, 789 (1953) L. N. Cooper and E. M. Henley, 92, 801 (1953)
  13. D. G. Ravenhall and D. R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. 96, 239 (1954)
  14. Omitted endnote

  15. M. H. Johnson and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 93, 357 (1954)
  16. W. J. Swiatecki, Phys. Rev. 98, 203-204 (1955)
  17. W. N. Hess and B. J. Moyer, Phys. Rev. 96, 859(A) (1954) W. N. Hess, University of California Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-2670, 1954 (unpublished) L. N. Cooper and W. Tobocman, Phys. Rev. 97, 243 (1955)
  18. Lyman, Hanson, and Scott, Phys. Rev. 84, 626 (1951) A. E. Glassgold, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department, 1954 (unpublished)
  19. R. W. Williams, Phys. Rev. 98, 1387, 1393 (1955) personal communication, Coor, Hill, Hornyak, Smith, and Snow, 98, 1369 (1955) Chen, Leavitt, and Shapiro, 99, 857 (1955)
  20. M. M. Lévy, Phys. Rev. 88, 725 (1952)
  21. K. A. Brueckner and K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 92, 1023 (1953)
  22. J. M. Blatt and M. A. Kalos, Phys. Rev. 92, 1563 (1953)
  23. Omitted endnote

  24. S. D. Drell and K. Huang, Phys. Rev. 91, 1527 (1953)
  25. [L. I. Schiff, Phys. Rev. 83, 1 (1951)]
  26. Omitted endnote

  27. [1], Chapter III
  28. Brueckner, Levinson, and Mahmoud, Phys. Rev. 95, 217 (1954) K. A. Brueckner, 96, 908 (1954) ibid.97, 1351 (1955)
  29. [21] [21] [28]
  30. A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 94, 1061 (1954) 89, 1158 (1953) [24]
  31. W. Magnus and F. Obberhettinger, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1949)
  32. [24] Brueckner, Levinson, and Mahmoud ([28]) [24]
  33. R. L. Pease and H. Feshbach, Phys. Rev. 88, 945 (1952)
  34. L. Rosenfeld, Nuclear Forces (North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1948), p. 234
  35. D. R. Inglis, Revs. Modern Phys. 25, 390 (1953) J. P. Elliott and B. H. Flowers, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) (to be published)
  36. G. Bonnevay, Compt. rend. 16, 1641 (1954)
  37. [1], p. 143
  38. G. Wentzel, Quantum Theory of Wave Fields (Interscience Press, New York, 1950)
  39. Omitted endnote

  40. E. M. Henley and M. A. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. 92, 1036 (1953)
  41. Omitted endnote

  42. N. Francis and K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 92, 291 (1953)
  43. [2] ([2])
  44. S. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. 91, 5 (1953)
  45. Omitted endnote

  46. Omitted endnote

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation