- Access by Xinjiang University
-Capture - Positron Ratios for the First-Forbidden Transitions of and the Relative Probabilities of - and - Electron Capture
Phys. Rev. 100, 74 – Published 1 October, 1955
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.74
Abstract
The radiations from have been investigated by means of scintillation coincidence spectrometer techniques in order to obtain the relative intensities of the various transitions. The energies and abundances of the radiations are 0.44-Mev (5%), 0.81-Mev (10%), 1.70-Mev (9%), 0.89-Mev (64%), and 1.91-Mev (0.9%). [Note added in proof.—The has been shown to be 0.91 Mev (2.5%).] Electron capture populates the level 1.91 Mev above the ground state, competes (54%) with the 0.81-Mev to populate the level 0.89 Mev above ground, and competes (21%) with the 1.70-Mev in effecting transitions to the ground state of . The ratios of -capture to positron emission for the transition to the 0.89-Mev level (, yes) and to the ground state (, yes) are 5.15±0.38 and 2.06±0.36, respectively. These values are in qualitative agreement with theory. Nucleon configurations of the several states of , , and are discussed. In the decay to the 0.89-Mev level an -capture ratio of 0.12±0.05 was obtained by use of a value, 0.65, for the fluorescence yield of krypton. Alternatively, an experimental value for the fluorescence yield, 0.62±0.03, may be computed if the theoretical -capture ratio is assumed.
References (33)
- W. C. Barber, Phys. Rev. 72, 1156 (1947)
- W. C. Beckham and M. L. Pool, Phys. Rev. 80, 125 (1950)
- D. G. Karraker and D. H. Templeton, Phys. Rev. 80, 646 (1950)
- C. M. Huddleston and A. C. G. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. 88, 1250 (1952)
- G. Scharff-Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 90, 587 (1953)
- K. Way and M. Wood, Phys. Rev. 94, 119 (1954)
- L. M. Langer and R. B. Duffield (private communication reported in [4])
- P. F. A. Klinkenberg, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 63 (1952)
- D. T. Stevenson and M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. 84, 1071 (1951)
- E. H. Bellamy, Nature 168, 556 (1951)
- Good, Peaslee, and Deutsch, Phys. Rev. 69, 313 (1946)
- R. Nataf and R. Bouchez, J. phys. radium 13, 190 (1952)
- H. Brysk and M. E. Rose, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL 1830 (unpublished)
- Max Wolfsberg (private communication)
- King, Dismuke, and Way, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL 1450 (unpublished)
- J. K. Major and L. C. Biedenharn, Revs. Modern Phys. 26, 321 (1954)
- R. Sherr and R. H. Miller, Phys. Rev. 93, 1076 (1954)
- Marty, Langevin, and Hubert, J. phys. radium 14, 663 (1953) M. L. Perlman and J. P. Welker, Phys. Rev. 95, 133 (1954) Koerts, Macklin, Farrelly, van Lieshout, and Wu, 98, 1230 (1955)
- Johansson, Cauchois, and Siegbahn, Phys. Rev. 82, 275 (1951)
Omitted endnote
- S. V. Castner and D. H. Templeton, Phys. Rev. 88, 1126 (1952)
- H. Morinaga, Phys. Rev. 99, 655(A) (1955)
- H. MorinagaNuclear Data, National Bureau of Standards Circular 499 and Supplements (U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1950)
- M. L. Perlman and J. P. Welker, following paper [Phys. Rev. 100, 81 (1955)]
- P. R. Bell (privately circulated data)
- R. W. King and D. C. Peaslee, Phys. Rev. 94, 1284 (1954)
- A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 92, 1211 (1953)
- Dr. C. S. Wu and Miss N. Benczer unpublished results
- G. Scharff-Goldhaber and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. 98, 212 (1955)
- Pontecorvo, Kirkwood, and Hanna, Phys. Rev. 75, 982 (1949)
- M. Langevin, Compt. rend. 239, 1625 (1954)
- M. Langevin and P. Radvanyi, Compt. rend. 238, 77 (1954)
- Broyles, Thomas, and Haynes, Phys. Rev. 89, 715 (1953)