All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Cloud-Chamber Observations on Charged V Particles

W. H. Arnold, J. Ballam, and George T. Reynolds

  • Palmer Physical Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Phys. Rev. 100, 295 – Published 1 October, 1955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.295

Abstract

In an experiment utilizing the double cloud-chamber technique at an altitude of 10 600 ft, 46 charged V particles have been observed. Where possible these have been classified according to the value, p*, of the momentum of the charged decay particle in the rest system of the primary particle. On this basis decaying particles have been classed as:

1. Consistent with two-body decay of known heavy mesons and not consistent with known hyperons.

2. Consistent with two-body decay of heavy mesons but also consistent with two-body decay of hyperons.

3. Not consistent with two-body decay of heavy mesons.

In the first group it is generally not possible to distinguish between the possibilities θπ+π0, on the one hand and Kμ2μ+ν on the other. However, several cases suggest strongly the θ particle and yield an average mass 953±18me. Several other special decay events are reported. After classification by p*, lifetime measurements are made on groups consistent with two-body heavy meson decay. The nine positive events in this class give a lifetime 3.7×1010<τ<8.5×1010 sec with 50% confidence limits, and 7% probability that τ>5×109 sec. The six negative events in this class give a lifetime 3.0×1010<τ<8.0×1010 sec with 50% confidence limits and 11% probability that τ>5×109 sec. Effects of possible biases are discussed and it is concluded that these lifetimes characterize the charged θ meson. No unambiguous examples of the Kμ3 or Ke3 heavy mesons were observed.

References (17)

  1. Gregory, Lagarrigue, Leprince-Ringuet, Muller, and Peyrou, Nuovo cimento 11, 292 (1954)
  2. Hodson, Ballam, Arnold, Harris, Rau, Reynolds, and Treiman, Phys. Rev. 96, 1089 (1954)
  3. B. Rossi, Proceedings of the Rochester Conference, February, 1955 (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1955)
  4. R. H. Dalitz, Proceedings of the Rochester Conference, February, 1955 (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1955)
  5. Ballam, Hodson, and Reynolds, Phys. Rev. 99, 1038 (1955) Armenteros, Gregory, Hendel, Lagarrigue, Leprince-Ringuet, Muller, and Peyrou, Nuovo cimento I, 915 (1955) Bridge, DeStaebler, Rossi, and Sreekantan, I, 874 (1955)
  6. G. T. Reynolds and W. Aron, Phys. Rev. 99, 1038 (1955)
  7. Arnold, Ballam, Lindeberg, and van Lint, Phys. Rev. 98, 838 (1955)
  8. B. Gregory (private communication)
  9. H. De Staebler, Jr., and B. V. Sreekantan, Phys. Rev. 98, 1520 (1955)
  10. H. De Staebler, Jr.B. V. SreekantanProceedings of the Rochester Conference, 1955 (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1955)
  11. M. S. Bartlett, Phil. Mag. 44, 249 (1953)
  12. G. Menon, Proceedings of the Rochester Conference, 1955 (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1955)
  13. Armenteros, Gregory, Lagarrigue, Leprince-Ringuet, Muller, and Peyrou, Nuovo cimento, Suppl. 2, 324 (1954)
  14. Bridge, Peyrou, Rossi, and Safford, Phys. Rev. 90, 921 (1953)
  15. Buchanan, Cooper, Millar, and Newth, Phil. Mag. 45, 1025 (1954)
  16. K. Robinson, Phys. Rev. 99, 642(A) (1955)
  17. Barker, Binnie, Hyams, Rout, and Shepherd, Phil. Mag. 46, 307 (1955)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation