- Access by Xinjiang University
Coulomb Excitation of Rare-Earth Nuclei with Alpha Particles
Phys. Rev. 100, 150 – Published 1 October, 1955
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.150
Abstract
Using our doubly charged He beam at 6 Mev we have excited most low-lying (rotational) states in the nuclei between and . Assignments were made with isotopically enriched targets where available. On the whole the predictions of the "strong coupling" approximation of the unified model are strikingly borne out by our observations. All first-excited states of even-even nuclei lying below ∼600 kev were observed, some of which were previously unknown. Two excited states were found in most odd- nuclei as revealed by direct and/or cascade radiation to the ground state as well as coincidence measurements. The positions of the first two rotational levels agree with the simple interval rule in all established cases within the experimental accuracy. The majority of these states are not found in beta-ray spectroscopy. The reduced electric-quadrupole transition probabilities for all these transitions were measured and found to be some 50 to 100 times greater than those expected for an independent particle. Good agreement was found with some values of these quantities available from direct lifetime observations, giving us confidence in the correctness of both the theoretical expression for the total excitation cross section, and the experimental approach for its determination. A systematic decrease in these transition probabilities is evident in even-even nuclei upon approaching the closed-neutron shell at ; a corresponding increase in the energy of the levels reflects the common origin of both phenomena, namely the decrease of the intrinsic deformation of the nuclei. However, the absolute magnitude derived for this deformation depends upon which manifestation is used.
Some evidence for a difference in splitting constants between even-even, even-odd, and odd-even nuclei is found. Within the rather large uncertainties the transition probabilities do not seem to show a corresponding variation.
References (61)
- G. M. Temmer and N. P. Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 93, 351 (1954)
- N. P. Heydenburg and G. M. Temmer, Phys. Rev. 93, 906 (1954)
- M. Goldhaber and A. W. Sunyar, Phys. Rev. 83, 906 (1951)
- A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selkab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 27, No. 16 (1953)
- G. M. Temmer and N. P. Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 94, 1399 (1954)
Omitted endnote
- F. K. McGowan, Phys. Rev. 80, 923 (1950) ibid.85, 151 (1952) ibid.87, 542 (1952)
- A. W. Sunyar, Phys. Rev. 95, 626 (1954) ibid.98, 653 (1955)
- A. Bohr, dissertation, Copenhagen, 1954 (unpublished) Beta- and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy, edited by K. Siegbahn (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1955), Chap. 17
- G. Scharff-Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 90, 587 (1953)
- P. Stähelin and P. Preiswerk, Nuovo cimento 10, 1219 (1953)
- N. P. Heydenburg and G. M. Temmer, Phys. Rev. 94, 1252 (1954)
- J. W. Bittner, Rev. Sci. Instr. 25, 1058 (1954)
- G. M. Temmer and N. P. Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 96, 426 (1954)
Omitted endnote
- Maeder, Müller, and Wintersteiger, Helv. Phys. Acta 27, 3 (1954)
- Alder, Bohr, Huus, Mottelson, Winther, and Zupančič, Revs. Modern Phys. (to be published)
- C. Zupančič and T. Huus, Phys. Rev. 94, 205 (1954)
- K. Alder and A. Winther, Phys. Rev. 96, 237 (1954) [17]
- G. Breit and P. B. Daitch, Phys. Rev. 96, 1447 (1954)
- L. C. Biedenharn and C. M. Class, Phys. Rev. 98, 691 (1955)
Omitted endnote
- T. Huus and B. R. Mottelson (private communication)
- C. B. Madsen, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 27, No. 13 (1953)
- Chilton, Cooper, and Harris, Phys. Rev. 93, 413 (1954)
- J. Lindhard and M. Scharff, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 27, No. 15 (1953)
Omitted endnote
- Rose, Goertzel, Spinrad, Harr, and Strong, Phys. Rev. 83, 79 (1951) Rose, Goertzel, and Swift (privately circulated tables)
- Gellman, Griffith, and Stanley, Phys. Rev. 85, 944 (1952)
- T. Huus (private communication)
Omitted endnote
- C. R. Pruett and R. G. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. 96, 1340 (1954)
- Ambler, Hudson, and Temmer (private communication)
- Ambler, Hudson, and Temmer, Phys. Rev. 97, 1212 (1955) (to be published)
- Simmons, Van Patter, Famularo, and Stuart, Phys. Rev. 97, 89 (1955)
- G. Scharff-Goldhaber and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. 98, 212 (1955)
- V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 83, 1073 (1951)
Omitted endnote
- N. Marty, Compt. rend. 238, 2516 (1954)
- E. L. Church (private communication)
- R. E. Hein and A. F. Voigt, Phys. Rev. 79, 783 (1950)
- E. L. Church and M. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. 95, 626 (1954)
- K. Murakawa, Phys. Rev. 96, 1543 (1954)
- K. Murakawa and T. Kamei, Phys. Rev. 92, 325 (1953)
- M. Goldhaber and R. D. Hill, Revs. Modern Phys. 24, 179 (1952)
- Martin, Jensen, Hughes, and Nichols, Phys. Rev. 82, 579 (1951)
- N. P. Heydenburg and G. M. Temmer, Phys. Rev. 95, 861 (1954)
- Murray, Boehm, Marmier, and DuMond, Phys. Rev. 97, 1007 (1955)
- Graham, Wolfson, and Bell, Can. J. Phys. 30, 459 (1952)
- J. P. Mize (private communication) Mize, Bunker, and Starner, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 30, No. 3, 71 (1955)
- McClelland, Mark, and Goodman, Phys. Rev. 97, 1191 (1955)
- E. Rasmussen, Naturwiss. 23, 69 (1935)
- P. Marmier and F. Boehm, Phys. Rev. 97, 103 (1955)
- T. Huus and C. Zupančič, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat.-fys. Medd. 28, No. 1 (1953)
- K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 95, 1250 (1954)
- G. M. Temmer and N. P. Heydenburg, Phys. Rev. 98, 1308 (1955) to be published
- C. J. Mullin and E. Guth, Phys. Rev. 82, 141 (1951)
- Stephens, Asaro, and Perlman, Phys. Rev. 96, 1568 (1954)
- Milsted, Rosenblum, and Valadares, Compt. rend. 239, 259 (1954)
- P. P. Day, Phys. Rev. 97, 689 (1955)
- F. K. McGowan, Phys. Rev. 93, 471 (1954)